-
Jens Axboe authored
The blk-mq tagging tries to maintain some locality between CPUs and the tags issued. The tags are split into groups of words, and the words may not be fully populated. When searching for a new free tag, blk-mq may look at partial words, hence it passes in an offset/size to find_next_zero_bit(). However, it does that wrong, the size must always be the full length of the number of tags in that word, otherwise we'll potentially miss some near the end. Another issue is when __bt_get() goes from one word set to the next. It bumps the index, but not the last_tag associated with the previous index. Bump that to be in the range of the new word. Finally, clean up __bt_get() and __bt_get_word() a bit and get rid of the goto in there, and the unnecessary 'wrap' variable. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
0bf36498