The KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL() macro currently uses KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ() to
compare fail_data.report_expected and fail_data.report_found.  This always
gave a somewhat useless error message on failure, but the addition of
extra compile-time checking with READ_ONCE() has caused it to get much
longer, and be truncated before anything useful is displayed.

Instead, just check fail_data.report_found by hand (we've just set
report_expected to 'true'), and print a better failure message with
KUNIT_FAIL().  Because of this, report_expected is no longer used
anywhere, and can be removed.

Beforehand, a failure in:
KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, ((volatile char *)area)[3100]);
would have looked like:
[22:00:34] [FAILED] vmalloc_oob
[22:00:34]     # vmalloc_oob: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_kasan.c:991
[22:00:34]     Expected ({ do { extern void __compiletime_assert_705(void) __attribute__((__error__("Unsupported access size for {READ,WRITE}_ONCE()."))); if (!((sizeof(fail_data.report_expected) == sizeof(char) || sizeof(fail_data.repp
[22:00:34]     not ok 45 - vmalloc_oob

With this change, it instead looks like:
[22:04:04] [FAILED] vmalloc_oob
[22:04:04]     # vmalloc_oob: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_kasan.c:993
[22:04:04]     KASAN failure expected in "((volatile char *)area)[3100]", but none occurred
[22:04:04]     not ok 45 - vmalloc_oob

Also update the example failure in the documentation to reflect this.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210606005531.165954-1-davidgow@google.comSigned-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>