-
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) authored
Since the rethook::handler is an RCU-maganged pointer so that it will notice readers the rethook is stopped (unregistered) or not, it should be an __rcu pointer and use appropriate functions to be accessed. This will use appropriate memory barrier when accessing it. OTOH, rethook::data is never changed, so we don't need to check it in get_kretprobe(). NOTE: To avoid sparse warning, rethook::handler is defined by a raw function pointer type with __rcu instead of rethook_handler_t. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/170126066201.398836.837498688669005979.stgit@devnote2/ Fixes: 54ecbe6f ("rethook: Add a generic return hook") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311241808.rv9ceuAh-lkp@intel.com/Tested-by: JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
a1461f1f