-
Steven Rostedt authored
Even though the parent is recorded with the normal function tracing of the latency tracers (irqsoff and wakeup), the function graph recording is bogus. This is due to the function graph messing with the return stack. The latency tracers pass in as the parent CALLER_ADDR0, which works fine for plain function tracing. But this causes bogus output with the graph tracer: 3) <idle>-0 | d.s3. 0.000 us | return_to_handler(); 3) <idle>-0 | d.s3. 0.000 us | _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(); 3) <idle>-0 | d.s3. 0.000 us | return_to_handler(); 3) <idle>-0 | d.s3. 0.000 us | trace_hardirqs_on(); The "return_to_handle()" call is the trampoline of the function graph tracer, and is meaningless in this context. Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
78c89ba1