This patch fixes the lock inversion complaint:

============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.3.0-rc7-dbg+ #1 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
kworker/u16:6/171 is trying to acquire lock:
00000000035c6e6c (&id_priv->handler_mutex){+.+.}, at: rdma_destroy_id+0x78/0x4a0 [rdma_cm]

but task is already holding lock:
00000000bc7c307d (&id_priv->handler_mutex){+.+.}, at: iw_conn_req_handler+0x151/0x680 [rdma_cm]

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&id_priv->handler_mutex);
  lock(&id_priv->handler_mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

 May be due to missing lock nesting notation

3 locks held by kworker/u16:6/171:
 #0: 00000000e2eaa773 ((wq_completion)iw_cm_wq){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x472/0xac0
 #1: 000000001efd357b ((work_completion)(&work->work)#3){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x476/0xac0
 #2: 00000000bc7c307d (&id_priv->handler_mutex){+.+.}, at: iw_conn_req_handler+0x151/0x680 [rdma_cm]

stack backtrace:
CPU: 3 PID: 171 Comm: kworker/u16:6 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc7-dbg+ #1
Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
Workqueue: iw_cm_wq cm_work_handler [iw_cm]
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x8a/0xd6
 __lock_acquire.cold+0xe1/0x24d
 lock_acquire+0x106/0x240
 __mutex_lock+0x12e/0xcb0
 mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30
 rdma_destroy_id+0x78/0x4a0 [rdma_cm]
 iw_conn_req_handler+0x5c9/0x680 [rdma_cm]
 cm_work_handler+0xe62/0x1100 [iw_cm]
 process_one_work+0x56d/0xac0
 worker_thread+0x7a/0x5d0
 kthread+0x1bc/0x210
 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30

This is not a bug as there are actually two lock classes here.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190930231707.48259-3-bvanassche@acm.org
Fixes: de910bd9 ("RDMA/cma: Simplify locking needed for serialization of callbacks")
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>