Patch series "make the hugetlb migration strategy consistent", v2.

As discussed in previous thread [1], there is an inconsistency when
handling hugetlb migration.  When handling the migration of freed hugetlb,
it prevents fallback to other NUMA nodes in
alloc_and_dissolve_hugetlb_folio().  However, when dealing with in-use
hugetlb, it allows fallback to other NUMA nodes in
alloc_hugetlb_folio_nodemask(), which can break the per-node hugetlb pool
and might result in unexpected failures when node bound workloads doesn't
get what is asssumed available.

This patchset tries to make the hugetlb migration strategy more clear
and consistent. Please find details in each patch.

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/6f26ce22d2fcd523418a085f2c588fe0776d46e7.1706794035.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com/


This patch (of 2):

To support different hugetlb allocation strategies during hugetlb
migration based on various migration reasons, record the migration reason
in the migration_target_control structure as a preparation.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1709719720.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/7b95d4981e07211f57139fc5b1f7ce91b920cee4.1709719720.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>