Commit 0c7e314a authored by Bob Pearson's avatar Bob Pearson Committed by Jason Gunthorpe

RDMA/rxe: Fix rxe_cq_post

A recent patch replaced a tasklet execution of cq->comp_handler by a
direct call. While this made sense it let changes to cq->notify state be
unprotected and assumed that the cq completion machinery and the ulp done
callbacks were reentrant. The result is that in some cases completion
events can be lost. This patch moves the cq->comp_handler call inside of
the spinlock in rxe_cq_post which solves both issues. This is compatible
with the matching code in the request notify verb.

Fixes: 78b26a33 ("RDMA/rxe: Remove tasklet call from rxe_cq.c")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230612155032.17036-1-rpearsonhpe@gmail.comSigned-off-by: default avatarBob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
parent 699826f4
...@@ -113,8 +113,6 @@ int rxe_cq_post(struct rxe_cq *cq, struct rxe_cqe *cqe, int solicited) ...@@ -113,8 +113,6 @@ int rxe_cq_post(struct rxe_cq *cq, struct rxe_cqe *cqe, int solicited)
queue_advance_producer(cq->queue, QUEUE_TYPE_TO_CLIENT); queue_advance_producer(cq->queue, QUEUE_TYPE_TO_CLIENT);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cq->cq_lock, flags);
if ((cq->notify == IB_CQ_NEXT_COMP) || if ((cq->notify == IB_CQ_NEXT_COMP) ||
(cq->notify == IB_CQ_SOLICITED && solicited)) { (cq->notify == IB_CQ_SOLICITED && solicited)) {
cq->notify = 0; cq->notify = 0;
...@@ -122,6 +120,8 @@ int rxe_cq_post(struct rxe_cq *cq, struct rxe_cqe *cqe, int solicited) ...@@ -122,6 +120,8 @@ int rxe_cq_post(struct rxe_cq *cq, struct rxe_cqe *cqe, int solicited)
cq->ibcq.comp_handler(&cq->ibcq, cq->ibcq.cq_context); cq->ibcq.comp_handler(&cq->ibcq, cq->ibcq.cq_context);
} }
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cq->cq_lock, flags);
return 0; return 0;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment