riscv: Improve sbi_ecall() code generation by reordering arguments
The sbi_ecall() function arguments are not in the same order as the ecall arguments, so we end up re-ordering the registers before the ecall which is useless and costly. So simply reorder the arguments in the same way as expected by ecall. Instead of reordering directly the arguments of sbi_ecall(), use a proxy macro since the current ordering is more natural. Before: Dump of assembler code for function sbi_ecall: 0xffffffff800085e0 <+0>: add sp,sp,-32 0xffffffff800085e2 <+2>: sd s0,24(sp) 0xffffffff800085e4 <+4>: mv t1,a0 0xffffffff800085e6 <+6>: add s0,sp,32 0xffffffff800085e8 <+8>: mv t3,a1 0xffffffff800085ea <+10>: mv a0,a2 0xffffffff800085ec <+12>: mv a1,a3 0xffffffff800085ee <+14>: mv a2,a4 0xffffffff800085f0 <+16>: mv a3,a5 0xffffffff800085f2 <+18>: mv a4,a6 0xffffffff800085f4 <+20>: mv a5,a7 0xffffffff800085f6 <+22>: mv a6,t3 0xffffffff800085f8 <+24>: mv a7,t1 0xffffffff800085fa <+26>: ecall 0xffffffff800085fe <+30>: ld s0,24(sp) 0xffffffff80008600 <+32>: add sp,sp,32 0xffffffff80008602 <+34>: ret After: Dump of assembler code for function __sbi_ecall: 0xffffffff8000b6b2 <+0>: add sp,sp,-32 0xffffffff8000b6b4 <+2>: sd s0,24(sp) 0xffffffff8000b6b6 <+4>: add s0,sp,32 0xffffffff8000b6b8 <+6>: ecall 0xffffffff8000b6bc <+10>: ld s0,24(sp) 0xffffffff8000b6be <+12>: add sp,sp,32 0xffffffff8000b6c0 <+14>: ret Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com> Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> Reviewed-by: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@bytedance.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240322112629.68170-1-alexghiti@rivosinc.comSigned-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment