Commit 272023df authored by Atsushi Nemoto's avatar Atsushi Nemoto Committed by David Woodhouse

mtd: nand: Fix memory leak on txx9ndfmc probe failure.

Commit 81933046 ('mtd: Fix handling of
mtdname in txx9ndfmc.c') introduced a potential memory leak. The
'mtdname' member of the private data structure is now allocated
separately, but was not freed on certain error paths.

Fix that, and make things simpler by _always_ allocating it separately
so that we don't need 'if (mtdname != dev_name()) kfree(mtdname);'...
which gets ugly now that we're doing it more than once, and more likely
that we'll get it wrong some time.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAtsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
parent bfee1a43
......@@ -336,20 +336,21 @@ static int __init txx9ndfmc_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
txx9_priv->cs = i;
txx9_priv->mtdname = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s.%u",
dev_name(&dev->dev), i);
} else {
txx9_priv->cs = -1;
txx9_priv->mtdname = kstrdup(dev_name(&dev->dev),
GFP_KERNEL);
}
if (!txx9_priv->mtdname) {
kfree(txx9_priv);
dev_err(&dev->dev,
"Unable to allocate TXx9 NDFMC MTD device name.\n");
dev_err(&dev->dev, "Unable to allocate MTD name.\n");
continue;
}
} else {
txx9_priv->cs = -1;
txx9_priv->mtdname = dev_name(&dev->dev);
}
if (plat->wide_mask & (1 << i))
chip->options |= NAND_BUSWIDTH_16;
if (nand_scan(mtd, 1)) {
kfree(txx9_priv->mtdname);
kfree(txx9_priv);
continue;
}
......@@ -391,7 +392,6 @@ static int __exit txx9ndfmc_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
kfree(drvdata->parts[i]);
#endif
del_mtd_device(mtd);
if (txx9_priv->mtdname != dev_name(&dev->dev))
kfree(txx9_priv->mtdname);
kfree(txx9_priv);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment