Commit 3cdd98b4 authored by Namhyung Kim's avatar Namhyung Kim Committed by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf maps: Remove check_invariants() from maps__lock()

I found that the debug build was a slowed down a lot by the maps lock
code since it checks the invariants whenever it gets the pointer to the
lock.  This means it checks twice the invariants before and after the
access.

Instead, let's move the checking code within the lock area but after any
modification and remove it from the read paths.  This would remove (more
than) half of the maps lock overhead.

The time for perf report with a huge data file (200k+ of MMAP2 events).

  Non-debug     Before      After
  ---------   --------   --------
     2m 43s     6m 45s     4m 21s
Reviewed-by: default avatarIan Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarNamhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240429225738.1491791-1-namhyung@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
parent e3123079
......@@ -211,11 +211,6 @@ void maps__set_unwind_libunwind_ops(struct maps *maps, const struct unwind_libun
static struct rw_semaphore *maps__lock(struct maps *maps)
{
/*
* When the lock is acquired or released the maps invariants should
* hold.
*/
check_invariants(maps);
return &RC_CHK_ACCESS(maps)->lock;
}
......@@ -358,6 +353,7 @@ static int map__strcmp(const void *a, const void *b)
static int maps__sort_by_name(struct maps *maps)
{
int err = 0;
down_write(maps__lock(maps));
if (!maps__maps_by_name_sorted(maps)) {
struct map **maps_by_name = maps__maps_by_name(maps);
......@@ -384,6 +380,7 @@ static int maps__sort_by_name(struct maps *maps)
maps__set_maps_by_name_sorted(maps, true);
}
}
check_invariants(maps);
up_write(maps__lock(maps));
return err;
}
......@@ -502,6 +499,7 @@ int maps__insert(struct maps *maps, struct map *map)
down_write(maps__lock(maps));
ret = __maps__insert(maps, map);
check_invariants(maps);
up_write(maps__lock(maps));
return ret;
}
......@@ -536,6 +534,7 @@ void maps__remove(struct maps *maps, struct map *map)
{
down_write(maps__lock(maps));
__maps__remove(maps, map);
check_invariants(maps);
up_write(maps__lock(maps));
}
......@@ -602,6 +601,7 @@ void maps__remove_maps(struct maps *maps, bool (*cb)(struct map *map, void *data
else
i++;
}
check_invariants(maps);
up_write(maps__lock(maps));
}
......@@ -942,6 +942,8 @@ int maps__copy_from(struct maps *dest, struct maps *parent)
map__put(new);
}
}
check_invariants(dest);
up_read(maps__lock(parent));
up_write(maps__lock(dest));
return err;
......@@ -1097,6 +1099,7 @@ void maps__fixup_end(struct maps *maps)
map__set_end(maps_by_address[n - 1], ~0ULL);
RC_CHK_ACCESS(maps)->ends_broken = false;
check_invariants(maps);
up_write(maps__lock(maps));
}
......@@ -1147,6 +1150,8 @@ int maps__merge_in(struct maps *kmaps, struct map *new_map)
map__start(kmaps_maps_by_address[first_after_]) >= map__end(new_map)) {
/* No overlap so regular insert suffices. */
int ret = __maps__insert(kmaps, new_map);
check_invariants(kmaps);
up_write(maps__lock(kmaps));
return ret;
}
......@@ -1184,6 +1189,7 @@ int maps__merge_in(struct maps *kmaps, struct map *new_map)
map__zput(kmaps_maps_by_address[i]);
free(kmaps_maps_by_address);
check_invariants(kmaps);
up_write(maps__lock(kmaps));
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment