Commit 6473262e authored by Hans Verkuil's avatar Hans Verkuil Committed by Mauro Carvalho Chehab

[media] DocBook: EAGAIN == EWOULDBLOCK

Merge the two entries since they are one and the same error.
Signed-off-by: default avatarHans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
parent 7c287e91
...@@ -7,10 +7,12 @@ ...@@ -7,10 +7,12 @@
<tbody valign="top"> <tbody valign="top">
<!-- Keep it ordered alphabetically --> <!-- Keep it ordered alphabetically -->
<row> <row>
<entry>EAGAIN</entry> <entry>EAGAIN (aka EWOULDBLOCK)</entry>
<entry>The ioctl can't be handled because the device is in state where <entry>The ioctl can't be handled because the device is in state where
it can't perform it. This could happen for example in case where it can't perform it. This could happen for example in case where
device is sleeping and ioctl is performed to query statistics. device is sleeping and ioctl is performed to query statistics.
It is also returned when the ioctl would need to wait
for an event, but the device was opened in non-blocking mode.
</entry> </entry>
</row> </row>
<row> <row>
...@@ -63,11 +65,6 @@ ...@@ -63,11 +65,6 @@
permission, or some special capabilities is needed permission, or some special capabilities is needed
(e. g. root)</entry> (e. g. root)</entry>
</row> </row>
<row>
<entry>EWOULDBLOCK</entry>
<entry>Operation would block. Used when the ioctl would need to wait
for an event, but the device was opened in non-blocking mode.</entry>
</row>
</tbody> </tbody>
</tgroup> </tgroup>
</table> </table>
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment