Commit 6a41b4d3 authored by Alan Stern's avatar Alan Stern Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

OHCI: implement new semantics for URB_ISO_ASAP

This patch (as1614) updates the isochronous scheduling in ohci-hcd to
match the new semantics for URB_ISO_ASAP.  Testing revealed a hardware
bug in the way my OHCI controller handles expired isochronous TDs;
consequently the patch tries hard to avoid creating them (unlike the
ehci-hcd and uhci-hcd drivers).
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent c44b2250
......@@ -231,13 +231,41 @@ static int ohci_urb_enqueue (
frame &= ~(ed->interval - 1);
frame |= ed->branch;
urb->start_frame = frame;
}
} else if (ed->type == PIPE_ISOCHRONOUS) {
u16 next = ohci_frame_no(ohci) + 2;
u16 frame = ed->last_iso + ed->interval;
/* Behind the scheduling threshold? */
if (unlikely(tick_before(frame, next))) {
/* USB_ISO_ASAP: Round up to the first available slot */
if (urb->transfer_flags & URB_ISO_ASAP)
frame += (next - frame + ed->interval - 1) &
-ed->interval;
/*
* Not ASAP: Use the next slot in the stream. If
* the entire URB falls before the threshold, fail.
*/
else if (tick_before(frame + ed->interval *
(urb->number_of_packets - 1), next)) {
retval = -EXDEV;
usb_hcd_unlink_urb_from_ep(hcd, urb);
goto fail;
}
/* yes, only URB_ISO_ASAP is supported, and
* urb->start_frame is never used as input.
/*
* Some OHCI hardware doesn't handle late TDs
* correctly. After retiring them it proceeds to
* the next ED instead of the next TD. Therefore
* we have to omit the late TDs entirely.
*/
urb_priv->td_cnt = DIV_ROUND_UP(next - frame,
ed->interval);
}
urb->start_frame = frame;
}
} else if (ed->type == PIPE_ISOCHRONOUS)
urb->start_frame = ed->last_iso + ed->interval;
/* fill the TDs and link them to the ed; and
* enable that part of the schedule, if needed
......
......@@ -596,7 +596,6 @@ static void td_submit_urb (
urb_priv->ed->hwHeadP &= ~cpu_to_hc32 (ohci, ED_C);
}
urb_priv->td_cnt = 0;
list_add (&urb_priv->pending, &ohci->pending);
if (data_len)
......@@ -672,7 +671,8 @@ static void td_submit_urb (
* we could often reduce the number of TDs here.
*/
case PIPE_ISOCHRONOUS:
for (cnt = 0; cnt < urb->number_of_packets; cnt++) {
for (cnt = urb_priv->td_cnt; cnt < urb->number_of_packets;
cnt++) {
int frame = urb->start_frame;
// FIXME scheduling should handle frame counter
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment