Commit 6d14f5c7 authored by Tianjia Zhang's avatar Tianjia Zhang Committed by Casey Schaufler

Smack: Fix wrong semantics in smk_access_entry()

In the smk_access_entry() function, if no matching rule is found
in the rust_list, a negative error code will be used to perform bit
operations with the MAY_ enumeration value. This is semantically
wrong. This patch fixes this issue.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
parent 2734d6c1
......@@ -81,23 +81,22 @@ int log_policy = SMACK_AUDIT_DENIED;
int smk_access_entry(char *subject_label, char *object_label,
struct list_head *rule_list)
{
int may = -ENOENT;
struct smack_rule *srp;
list_for_each_entry_rcu(srp, rule_list, list) {
if (srp->smk_object->smk_known == object_label &&
srp->smk_subject->smk_known == subject_label) {
may = srp->smk_access;
break;
int may = srp->smk_access;
/*
* MAY_WRITE implies MAY_LOCK.
*/
if ((may & MAY_WRITE) == MAY_WRITE)
may |= MAY_LOCK;
return may;
}
}
/*
* MAY_WRITE implies MAY_LOCK.
*/
if ((may & MAY_WRITE) == MAY_WRITE)
may |= MAY_LOCK;
return may;
return -ENOENT;
}
/**
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment