tools headers UAPI: Update epoll_pwait2 affected files

To pick the changes from:

  b0a0c261 ("epoll: wire up syscall epoll_pwait2")

That addresses these perf build warning:

  Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h' differs from latest version at 'include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h'
  diff -u tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
  Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/perf/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl' differs from latest version at 'arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl'
  diff -u tools/perf/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl

Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
parent 58cf05f5
...@@ -859,9 +859,11 @@ __SYSCALL(__NR_pidfd_getfd, sys_pidfd_getfd) ...@@ -859,9 +859,11 @@ __SYSCALL(__NR_pidfd_getfd, sys_pidfd_getfd)
__SYSCALL(__NR_faccessat2, sys_faccessat2) __SYSCALL(__NR_faccessat2, sys_faccessat2)
#define __NR_process_madvise 440 #define __NR_process_madvise 440
__SYSCALL(__NR_process_madvise, sys_process_madvise) __SYSCALL(__NR_process_madvise, sys_process_madvise)
#define __NR_epoll_pwait2 441
__SC_COMP(__NR_epoll_pwait2, sys_epoll_pwait2, compat_sys_epoll_pwait2)
#undef __NR_syscalls #undef __NR_syscalls
#define __NR_syscalls 441 #define __NR_syscalls 442
/* /*
* 32 bit systems traditionally used different * 32 bit systems traditionally used different
......
...@@ -362,6 +362,7 @@ ...@@ -362,6 +362,7 @@
438 common pidfd_getfd sys_pidfd_getfd 438 common pidfd_getfd sys_pidfd_getfd
439 common faccessat2 sys_faccessat2 439 common faccessat2 sys_faccessat2
440 common process_madvise sys_process_madvise 440 common process_madvise sys_process_madvise
441 common epoll_pwait2 sys_epoll_pwait2
# #
# Due to a historical design error, certain syscalls are numbered differently # Due to a historical design error, certain syscalls are numbered differently
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment