Commit 75b245b3 authored by Thomas Renninger's avatar Thomas Renninger Committed by Len Brown

[ACPI] fix passive cooling regression

Return logic was inverted.
Going for changing the return value to not return zero as it is makes
more sense regarding the naming of the function (cpu_has_cpufreq()).

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3410Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
parent b05948d9
...@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ static int cpu_has_cpufreq(unsigned int cpu) ...@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ static int cpu_has_cpufreq(unsigned int cpu)
{ {
struct cpufreq_policy policy; struct cpufreq_policy policy;
if (!acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init || cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu)) if (!acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init || cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu))
return -ENODEV;
return 0; return 0;
return 1;
} }
static int acpi_thermal_cpufreq_increase(unsigned int cpu) static int acpi_thermal_cpufreq_increase(unsigned int cpu)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment