Commit 772c808a authored by Stanislaw Gruszka's avatar Stanislaw Gruszka Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched: Do not account bogus utime

Due to rounding in scale_stime(), for big numbers, scaled stime
values will grow in chunks. Since rtime grow in jiffies and we
calculate utime like below:

	prev->stime = max(prev->stime, stime);
	prev->utime = max(prev->utime, rtime - prev->stime);

we could erroneously account stime values as utime. To prevent
that only update prev->{u,s}time values when they are smaller
than current rtime.
Signed-off-by: default avatarStanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1367314507-9728-2-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.comSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 55eaa7c1
...@@ -581,6 +581,14 @@ static void cputime_adjust(struct task_cputime *curr, ...@@ -581,6 +581,14 @@ static void cputime_adjust(struct task_cputime *curr,
*/ */
rtime = nsecs_to_cputime(curr->sum_exec_runtime); rtime = nsecs_to_cputime(curr->sum_exec_runtime);
/*
* Update userspace visible utime/stime values only if actual execution
* time is bigger than already exported. Note that can happen, that we
* provided bigger values due to scaling inaccuracy on big numbers.
*/
if (prev->stime + prev->utime >= rtime)
goto out;
if (!rtime) { if (!rtime) {
stime = 0; stime = 0;
} else if (!total) { } else if (!total) {
...@@ -598,6 +606,7 @@ static void cputime_adjust(struct task_cputime *curr, ...@@ -598,6 +606,7 @@ static void cputime_adjust(struct task_cputime *curr,
prev->stime = max(prev->stime, stime); prev->stime = max(prev->stime, stime);
prev->utime = max(prev->utime, rtime - prev->stime); prev->utime = max(prev->utime, rtime - prev->stime);
out:
*ut = prev->utime; *ut = prev->utime;
*st = prev->stime; *st = prev->stime;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment