Commit 8501017e authored by Jaegeuk Kim's avatar Jaegeuk Kim

f2fs: check s_dirty under cp_mutex

It needs to check s_dirty under cp_mutex, since s_dirty is reset under that
mutex.
And previous condition was not correct, since we can omit doing checkpoint
when checkpoint was done followed by all the node pages were written back.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
parent 52746519
......@@ -952,6 +952,10 @@ void write_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool is_umount)
trace_f2fs_write_checkpoint(sbi->sb, is_umount, "start block_ops");
mutex_lock(&sbi->cp_mutex);
if (!sbi->s_dirty)
goto out;
block_operations(sbi);
trace_f2fs_write_checkpoint(sbi->sb, is_umount, "finish block_ops");
......@@ -976,9 +980,9 @@ void write_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool is_umount)
do_checkpoint(sbi, is_umount);
unblock_operations(sbi);
mutex_unlock(&sbi->cp_mutex);
stat_inc_cp_count(sbi->stat_info);
out:
mutex_unlock(&sbi->cp_mutex);
trace_f2fs_write_checkpoint(sbi->sb, is_umount, "finish checkpoint");
}
......
......@@ -460,9 +460,6 @@ int f2fs_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int sync)
trace_f2fs_sync_fs(sb, sync);
if (!sbi->s_dirty && !get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES))
return 0;
if (sync) {
mutex_lock(&sbi->gc_mutex);
write_checkpoint(sbi, false);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment