drm/i915: Unconfuse pre-icl vs. icl+ intel_sagv_{pre,post}_plane_update()

intel_sagv_{pre,post}_plane_update() can accidentally forget
to bail out early on pre-icl and proceed down the icl+ codepath
at the end of the function. Fortunately it'll bail out before
it gets too far due to old_qgv_mask==new_qgv_mask==0 so no real
bug here. But lets make the code less confusing anyway.

Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220214091811.13725-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c

@@ -3802,7 +3802,8 @@ void intel_sagv_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 	if (!new_bw_state)
 		return;
 
-	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 11 && !intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state)) {
+	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 11) {
+		if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state))
 			intel_disable_sagv(dev_priv);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -3853,7 +3854,8 @@ void intel_sagv_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 	if (!new_bw_state)
 		return;
 
-	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 11 && intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state)) {
+	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 11) {
+		if (intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state))
 			intel_enable_sagv(dev_priv);
 		return;
 	}