Commit a2efdbf4 authored by Eric W. Biederman's avatar Eric W. Biederman Committed by Thomas Gleixner

posix-cpu-timers: cpu_clock_sample_group() no longer needs siglock

As of e78c3496 ("time, signal: Protect resource use statistics with
seqlock") cpu_clock_sample_group() no longer needs siglock protection so
remove the stale comment.
Signed-off-by: default avatar"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87eeuevduq.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org
parent a67de48b
...@@ -336,9 +336,7 @@ static void __thread_group_cputime(struct task_struct *tsk, u64 *samples) ...@@ -336,9 +336,7 @@ static void __thread_group_cputime(struct task_struct *tsk, u64 *samples)
/* /*
* Sample a process (thread group) clock for the given task clkid. If the * Sample a process (thread group) clock for the given task clkid. If the
* group's cputime accounting is already enabled, read the atomic * group's cputime accounting is already enabled, read the atomic
* store. Otherwise a full update is required. Task's sighand lock must be * store. Otherwise a full update is required. clkid is already validated.
* held to protect the task traversal on a full update. clkid is already
* validated.
*/ */
static u64 cpu_clock_sample_group(const clockid_t clkid, struct task_struct *p, static u64 cpu_clock_sample_group(const clockid_t clkid, struct task_struct *p,
bool start) bool start)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment