bpf: Add support for bpf_get_func_ip helper for uprobe program
Adding support for bpf_get_func_ip helper for uprobe program to return probed address for both uprobe and return uprobe. We discussed this in [1] and agreed that uprobe can have special use of bpf_get_func_ip helper that differs from kprobe. The kprobe bpf_get_func_ip returns: - address of the function if probe is attach on function entry for both kprobe and return kprobe - 0 if the probe is not attach on function entry The uprobe bpf_get_func_ip returns: - address of the probe for both uprobe and return uprobe The reason for this semantic change is that kernel can't really tell if the probe user space address is function entry. The uprobe program is actually kprobe type program attached as uprobe. One of the consequences of this design is that uprobes do not have its own set of helpers, but share them with kprobes. As we need different functionality for bpf_get_func_ip helper for uprobe, I'm adding the bool value to the bpf_trace_run_ctx, so the helper can detect that it's executed in uprobe context and call specific code. The is_uprobe bool is set as true in bpf_prog_run_array_sleepable, which is currently used only for executing bpf programs in uprobe. Renaming bpf_prog_run_array_sleepable to bpf_prog_run_array_uprobe to address that it's only used for uprobes and that it sets the run_ctx.is_uprobe as suggested by Yafang Shao. Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzZ=xLVkG5eurEuvLU79wAMtwho7ReR+XJAgwhFF4M-7Cg@mail.gmail.com/Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Tested-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230807085956.2344866-2-jolsa@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment