Commit d40dcaa4 authored by Jakub Kicinski's avatar Jakub Kicinski

Merge branch 'mptcp-subflow-accounting-fix'

Mat Martineau says:

====================
mptcp: Subflow accounting fix

This series contains a bug fix affecting the in-kernel path manager
(patch 1), where closing subflows would sometimes not adjust the PM's
count of active subflows. Patch 2 updates the selftests to exercise the
new code.
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220512232642.541301-1-mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parents 04c494e6 e274f715
...@@ -178,14 +178,13 @@ void mptcp_pm_subflow_check_next(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct sock *ssk, ...@@ -178,14 +178,13 @@ void mptcp_pm_subflow_check_next(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct sock *ssk,
struct mptcp_pm_data *pm = &msk->pm; struct mptcp_pm_data *pm = &msk->pm;
bool update_subflows; bool update_subflows;
update_subflows = (ssk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE) && update_subflows = subflow->request_join || subflow->mp_join;
(subflow->request_join || subflow->mp_join);
if (!READ_ONCE(pm->work_pending) && !update_subflows) if (!READ_ONCE(pm->work_pending) && !update_subflows)
return; return;
spin_lock_bh(&pm->lock); spin_lock_bh(&pm->lock);
if (update_subflows) if (update_subflows)
pm->subflows--; __mptcp_pm_close_subflow(msk);
/* Even if this subflow is not really established, tell the PM to try /* Even if this subflow is not really established, tell the PM to try
* to pick the next ones, if possible. * to pick the next ones, if possible.
......
...@@ -833,6 +833,20 @@ unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_add_addr_accept_max(const struct mptcp_sock *msk); ...@@ -833,6 +833,20 @@ unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_add_addr_accept_max(const struct mptcp_sock *msk);
unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_subflows_max(const struct mptcp_sock *msk); unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_subflows_max(const struct mptcp_sock *msk);
unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_local_addr_max(const struct mptcp_sock *msk); unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_local_addr_max(const struct mptcp_sock *msk);
/* called under PM lock */
static inline void __mptcp_pm_close_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
{
if (--msk->pm.subflows < mptcp_pm_get_subflows_max(msk))
WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.accept_subflow, true);
}
static inline void mptcp_pm_close_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
{
spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
__mptcp_pm_close_subflow(msk);
spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
}
void mptcp_sockopt_sync(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk); void mptcp_sockopt_sync(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk);
void mptcp_sockopt_sync_locked(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk); void mptcp_sockopt_sync_locked(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk);
......
...@@ -1422,20 +1422,20 @@ int __mptcp_subflow_connect(struct sock *sk, const struct mptcp_addr_info *loc, ...@@ -1422,20 +1422,20 @@ int __mptcp_subflow_connect(struct sock *sk, const struct mptcp_addr_info *loc,
struct sockaddr_storage addr; struct sockaddr_storage addr;
int remote_id = remote->id; int remote_id = remote->id;
int local_id = loc->id; int local_id = loc->id;
int err = -ENOTCONN;
struct socket *sf; struct socket *sf;
struct sock *ssk; struct sock *ssk;
u32 remote_token; u32 remote_token;
int addrlen; int addrlen;
int ifindex; int ifindex;
u8 flags; u8 flags;
int err;
if (!mptcp_is_fully_established(sk)) if (!mptcp_is_fully_established(sk))
return -ENOTCONN; goto err_out;
err = mptcp_subflow_create_socket(sk, &sf); err = mptcp_subflow_create_socket(sk, &sf);
if (err) if (err)
return err; goto err_out;
ssk = sf->sk; ssk = sf->sk;
subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk); subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
...@@ -1492,6 +1492,12 @@ int __mptcp_subflow_connect(struct sock *sk, const struct mptcp_addr_info *loc, ...@@ -1492,6 +1492,12 @@ int __mptcp_subflow_connect(struct sock *sk, const struct mptcp_addr_info *loc,
failed: failed:
subflow->disposable = 1; subflow->disposable = 1;
sock_release(sf); sock_release(sf);
err_out:
/* we account subflows before the creation, and this failures will not
* be caught by sk_state_change()
*/
mptcp_pm_close_subflow(msk);
return err; return err;
} }
......
...@@ -1444,6 +1444,33 @@ chk_prio_nr() ...@@ -1444,6 +1444,33 @@ chk_prio_nr()
[ "${dump_stats}" = 1 ] && dump_stats [ "${dump_stats}" = 1 ] && dump_stats
} }
chk_subflow_nr()
{
local need_title="$1"
local msg="$2"
local subflow_nr=$3
local cnt1
local cnt2
if [ -n "${need_title}" ]; then
printf "%03u %-36s %s" "${TEST_COUNT}" "${TEST_NAME}" "${msg}"
else
printf "%-${nr_blank}s %s" " " "${msg}"
fi
cnt1=$(ss -N $ns1 -tOni | grep -c token)
cnt2=$(ss -N $ns2 -tOni | grep -c token)
if [ "$cnt1" != "$subflow_nr" -o "$cnt2" != "$subflow_nr" ]; then
echo "[fail] got $cnt1:$cnt2 subflows expected $subflow_nr"
fail_test
dump_stats=1
else
echo "[ ok ]"
fi
[ "${dump_stats}" = 1 ] && ( ss -N $ns1 -tOni ; ss -N $ns1 -tOni | grep token; ip -n $ns1 mptcp endpoint )
}
chk_link_usage() chk_link_usage()
{ {
local ns=$1 local ns=$1
...@@ -2556,7 +2583,7 @@ fastclose_tests() ...@@ -2556,7 +2583,7 @@ fastclose_tests()
fi fi
} }
implicit_tests() endpoint_tests()
{ {
# userspace pm type prevents add_addr # userspace pm type prevents add_addr
if reset "implicit EP"; then if reset "implicit EP"; then
...@@ -2578,6 +2605,23 @@ implicit_tests() ...@@ -2578,6 +2605,23 @@ implicit_tests()
$ns2 10.0.2.2 id 1 flags signal $ns2 10.0.2.2 id 1 flags signal
wait wait
fi fi
if reset "delete and re-add"; then
pm_nl_set_limits $ns1 1 1
pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 1 1
pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.2.2 id 2 dev ns2eth2 flags subflow
run_tests $ns1 $ns2 10.0.1.1 4 0 0 slow &
wait_mpj $ns2
pm_nl_del_endpoint $ns2 2 10.0.2.2
sleep 0.5
chk_subflow_nr needtitle "after delete" 1
pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.2.2 dev ns2eth2 flags subflow
wait_mpj $ns2
chk_subflow_nr "" "after re-add" 2
wait
fi
} }
# [$1: error message] # [$1: error message]
...@@ -2624,7 +2668,7 @@ all_tests_sorted=( ...@@ -2624,7 +2668,7 @@ all_tests_sorted=(
d@deny_join_id0_tests d@deny_join_id0_tests
m@fullmesh_tests m@fullmesh_tests
z@fastclose_tests z@fastclose_tests
I@implicit_tests I@endpoint_tests
) )
all_tests_args="" all_tests_args=""
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment