Commit d69300ab authored by Michal Wajdeczko's avatar Michal Wajdeczko

drm/xe/pf: Drop GuC notifications for non-existing VF

It is unlikely that GuC will ever send a G2H notification with an
invalid VFID and it is currently harmless if that actually happen.
But in upcoming patches we will start using that VFID as an index
and we must be sure it is a valid to avoid a crash due to a buggy
firmware or a currupted G2H message.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarPiotr Piórkowski <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240828210809.1528-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
parent 65fe9617
......@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include "xe_device.h"
#include "xe_gt.h"
#include "xe_gt_sriov_pf_control.h"
#include "xe_gt_sriov_pf_helpers.h"
#include "xe_gt_sriov_printk.h"
#include "xe_guc_ct.h"
#include "xe_sriov.h"
......@@ -212,6 +213,11 @@ static void pf_handle_vf_flr_done(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 vfid)
static int pf_handle_vf_event(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 vfid, u32 eventid)
{
xe_gt_sriov_dbg_verbose(gt, "received VF%u event %#x\n", vfid, eventid);
if (vfid > xe_gt_sriov_pf_get_totalvfs(gt))
return -EPROTO;
switch (eventid) {
case GUC_PF_NOTIFY_VF_FLR:
pf_handle_vf_flr(gt, vfid);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment