Commit dfd50fa9 authored by Mike Kravetz's avatar Mike Kravetz Committed by Kleber Sacilotto de Souza

hugetlb: use same fault hash key for shared and private mappings

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1832661

commit 1b426bac upstream.

hugetlb uses a fault mutex hash table to prevent page faults of the
same pages concurrently.  The key for shared and private mappings is
different.  Shared keys off address_space and file index.  Private keys
off mm and virtual address.  Consider a private mappings of a populated
hugetlbfs file.  A fault will map the page from the file and if needed
do a COW to map a writable page.

Hugetlbfs hole punch uses the fault mutex to prevent mappings of file
pages.  It uses the address_space file index key.  However, private
mappings will use a different key and could race with this code to map
the file page.  This causes problems (BUG) for the page cache remove
code as it expects the page to be unmapped.  A sample stack is:

page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_mapped(page))
kernel BUG at mm/filemap.c:169!
...
RIP: 0010:unaccount_page_cache_page+0x1b8/0x200
...
Call Trace:
__delete_from_page_cache+0x39/0x220
delete_from_page_cache+0x45/0x70
remove_inode_hugepages+0x13c/0x380
? __add_to_page_cache_locked+0x162/0x380
hugetlbfs_fallocate+0x403/0x540
? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
? __inode_security_revalidate+0x5d/0x70
? selinux_file_permission+0x100/0x130
vfs_fallocate+0x13f/0x270
ksys_fallocate+0x3c/0x80
__x64_sys_fallocate+0x1a/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x180
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

There seems to be another potential COW issue/race with this approach
of different private and shared keys as noted in commit 8382d914
("mm, hugetlb: improve page-fault scalability").

Since every hugetlb mapping (even anon and private) is actually a file
mapping, just use the address_space index key for all mappings.  This
results in potentially more hash collisions.  However, this should not
be the common case.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190328234704.27083-3-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190412165235.t4sscoujczfhuiyt@linux-r8p5
Fixes: b5cec28d ("hugetlbfs: truncate_hugepages() takes a range of pages")
Signed-off-by: default avatarMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarNaoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKhalid Elmously <khalid.elmously@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza@canonical.com>
parent 1ce31b44
......@@ -414,9 +414,7 @@ static void remove_inode_hugepages(struct inode *inode, loff_t lstart,
if (next >= end)
break;
hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(h, current->mm,
&pseudo_vma,
mapping, next, 0);
hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(h, mapping, next, 0);
mutex_lock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
lock_page(page);
......@@ -569,7 +567,6 @@ static long hugetlbfs_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset,
struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
struct hstate *h = hstate_inode(inode);
struct vm_area_struct pseudo_vma;
struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
loff_t hpage_size = huge_page_size(h);
unsigned long hpage_shift = huge_page_shift(h);
pgoff_t start, index, end;
......@@ -633,8 +630,7 @@ static long hugetlbfs_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset,
addr = index * hpage_size;
/* mutex taken here, fault path and hole punch */
hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(h, mm, &pseudo_vma, mapping,
index, addr);
hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(h, mapping, index, addr);
mutex_lock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
/* See if already present in mapping to avoid alloc/free */
......
......@@ -91,9 +91,7 @@ void putback_active_hugepage(struct page *page);
void free_huge_page(struct page *page);
void hugetlb_fix_reserve_counts(struct inode *inode, bool restore_reserve);
extern struct mutex *hugetlb_fault_mutex_table;
u32 hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(struct hstate *h, struct mm_struct *mm,
struct vm_area_struct *vma,
struct address_space *mapping,
u32 hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(struct hstate *h, struct address_space *mapping,
pgoff_t idx, unsigned long address);
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE
......
......@@ -3703,21 +3703,14 @@ static int hugetlb_no_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
u32 hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(struct hstate *h, struct mm_struct *mm,
struct vm_area_struct *vma,
struct address_space *mapping,
u32 hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(struct hstate *h, struct address_space *mapping,
pgoff_t idx, unsigned long address)
{
unsigned long key[2];
u32 hash;
if (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) {
key[0] = (unsigned long) mapping;
key[1] = idx;
} else {
key[0] = (unsigned long) mm;
key[1] = address >> huge_page_shift(h);
}
hash = jhash2((u32 *)&key, sizeof(key)/sizeof(u32), 0);
......@@ -3728,9 +3721,7 @@ u32 hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(struct hstate *h, struct mm_struct *mm,
* For uniprocesor systems we always use a single mutex, so just
* return 0 and avoid the hashing overhead.
*/
u32 hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(struct hstate *h, struct mm_struct *mm,
struct vm_area_struct *vma,
struct address_space *mapping,
u32 hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(struct hstate *h, struct address_space *mapping,
pgoff_t idx, unsigned long address)
{
return 0;
......@@ -3776,7 +3767,7 @@ int hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
* get spurious allocation failures if two CPUs race to instantiate
* the same page in the page cache.
*/
hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(h, mm, vma, mapping, idx, address);
hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(h, mapping, idx, address);
mutex_lock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
entry = huge_ptep_get(ptep);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment