Commit e219440d authored by Maor Dickman's avatar Maor Dickman Committed by Saeed Mahameed

net/mlx5: E-Switch, Use indirect table only if all destinations support it

When adding rule with multiple destinations, indirect table is used for all of
the destinations if at least one of the destinations support it, this can cause
creation of invalid indirect tables for the destinations that doesn't support it.

Fixed it by using indirect table only if all destinations support it.

Fixes: a508728a ("net/mlx5e: VF tunnel RX traffic offloading")
Signed-off-by: default avatarMaor Dickman <maord@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRoi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
parent 5c4e8ae7
...@@ -329,14 +329,25 @@ static bool ...@@ -329,14 +329,25 @@ static bool
esw_is_indir_table(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, struct mlx5_flow_attr *attr) esw_is_indir_table(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, struct mlx5_flow_attr *attr)
{ {
struct mlx5_esw_flow_attr *esw_attr = attr->esw_attr; struct mlx5_esw_flow_attr *esw_attr = attr->esw_attr;
bool result = false;
int i; int i;
for (i = esw_attr->split_count; i < esw_attr->out_count; i++) /* Indirect table is supported only for flows with in_port uplink
* and the destination is vport on the same eswitch as the uplink,
* return false in case at least one of destinations doesn't meet
* this criteria.
*/
for (i = esw_attr->split_count; i < esw_attr->out_count; i++) {
if (esw_attr->dests[i].rep && if (esw_attr->dests[i].rep &&
mlx5_esw_indir_table_needed(esw, attr, esw_attr->dests[i].rep->vport, mlx5_esw_indir_table_needed(esw, attr, esw_attr->dests[i].rep->vport,
esw_attr->dests[i].mdev)) esw_attr->dests[i].mdev)) {
return true; result = true;
return false; } else {
result = false;
break;
}
}
return result;
} }
static int static int
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment