Commit ecc5589f authored by Marcelo Tosatti's avatar Marcelo Tosatti Committed by Avi Kivity

KVM: MMU: optimize set_spte for page sync

The write protect verification in set_spte is unnecessary for page sync.

Its guaranteed that, if the unsync spte was writable, the target page
does not have a write protected shadow (if it had, the spte would have
been write protected under mmu_lock by rmap_write_protect before).

Same reasoning applies to mark_page_dirty: the gfn has been marked as
dirty via the pagefault path.

The cost of hash table and memslot lookups are quite significant if the
workload is pagetable write intensive resulting in increased mmu_lock
contention.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
parent 5319c662
...@@ -1593,6 +1593,15 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *shadow_pte, ...@@ -1593,6 +1593,15 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *shadow_pte,
spte |= PT_WRITABLE_MASK; spte |= PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
/*
* Optimization: for pte sync, if spte was writable the hash
* lookup is unnecessary (and expensive). Write protection
* is responsibility of mmu_get_page / kvm_sync_page.
* Same reasoning can be applied to dirty page accounting.
*/
if (!can_unsync && is_writeble_pte(*shadow_pte))
goto set_pte;
if (mmu_need_write_protect(vcpu, gfn, can_unsync)) { if (mmu_need_write_protect(vcpu, gfn, can_unsync)) {
pgprintk("%s: found shadow page for %lx, marking ro\n", pgprintk("%s: found shadow page for %lx, marking ro\n",
__func__, gfn); __func__, gfn);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment