- 11 May, 2015 40 commits
-
-
Al Viro authored
absolutely straightforward now - the only variables we need to preserve across the recursive call are name, link and cookie, and recursion depth is limited (and can is equal to nd->depth). So arrange an array of triples to hold instances of those and be done with that. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
reduce the number of returns in there - turn all places where it returns zero into goto OK and places where it returns non-zero into goto Err. The only non-trivial detail is that all breaks in the loop are guaranteed to be with non-zero err. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
What we do after the second walk_component() + put_link() + depth decrement in there is exactly equivalent to what's done right after the first walk_component(). Easy to verify and not at all surprising, seeing that there we have just walked the last component of nested symlink. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Pull the block after the if-else in the end of what used to be do-while body into all branches there. We are almost done with the massage... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
... it does nothing if nd->last_type is LAST_BIND. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
If we get ERR_PTR() from get_link(), we are guaranteed to get err != 0 when we break out of do-while, so we are going to hit if (err) return err; shortly after it. Pull that into the if (IS_ERR(s)) body. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
All remaining callers of the former are preceded by the latter Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
... and strip __always_inline from follow_link() - remaining callers don't need that. Now link_path_walk() recursion is a direct one. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
We used to need it to feed to follow_link(). No more... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
shares space with nameidata->next, walk_component() et.al. store the struct path of symlink instead of returning it into a variable passed by caller. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
with new calling conventions it's trivial Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Conflicts: fs/namei.c
-
Al Viro authored
Split a piece of fs/namei.c:follow_link() that does obtaining the link body into a separate function. follow_link() itself is converted to calling get_link() and then doing the body traversal (if any). The next step will expand follow_link() call in link_path_walk() and this helps to keep the size down... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
a) instead of storing the symlink body (via nd_set_link()) and returning an opaque pointer later passed to ->put_link(), ->follow_link() _stores_ that opaque pointer (into void * passed by address by caller) and returns the symlink body. Returning ERR_PTR() on error, NULL on jump (procfs magic symlinks) and pointer to symlink body for normal symlinks. Stored pointer is ignored in all cases except the last one. Storing NULL for opaque pointer (or not storing it at all) means no call of ->put_link(). b) the body used to be passed to ->put_link() implicitly (via nameidata). Now only the opaque pointer is. In the cases when we used the symlink body to free stuff, ->follow_link() now should store it as opaque pointer in addition to returning it. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
when we go for on-demand allocation of saved state in link_path_walk(), we'll want nameidata to stay around for all 3 calls of path_mountpoint(). Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
that avoids having nameidata on stack during the calls of ->rmdir()/->unlink() and *two* of those during the calls of ->rename(). Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
it's a convenient helper, but we'll want to shift nameidata down the call chain, so it won't be available there... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
With LOOKUP_FOLLOW we unlazy and return 1; without it we either fail with ELOOP or, for O_PATH opens, succeed. No need to mix those cases... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
When O_PATH is present, O_CREAT isn't, so symlink_ok is always equal to (open_flags & O_PATH) && !(nd->flags & LOOKUP_FOLLOW). Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
seriously improves the stack *and* I-cache footprint... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
NeilBrown authored
No ->inode_follow_link() methods use the nameidata arg, and it is about to become private to namei.c. So remove from all inode_follow_link() functions. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
ACK-by: Boaz Harrosh <ooo@electrozaur.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
for fast symlinks only, of course... Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
let "fast" symlinks store the pointer to the body into ->i_link and use simple_follow_link for ->follow_link() Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-