* for-next/selftests:
  kselftest: arm64: Add a null pointer check
  kselftest/arm64: Remove unused parameters in abi test

* for-next/perf: (41 commits)
  arm64: Add USER_STACKTRACE support
  drivers/perf: hisi: hns3: Actually use devm_add_action_or_reset()
  drivers/perf: hisi: hns3: Fix out-of-bound access when valid event group
  drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Fix out-of-bound access when valid event group
  perf/arm-spe: Assign parents for event_source device
  perf/arm-smmuv3: Assign parents for event_source device
  perf/arm-dsu: Assign parents for event_source device
  perf/arm-dmc620: Assign parents for event_source device
  perf/arm-ccn: Assign parents for event_source device
  perf/arm-cci: Assign parents for event_source device
  perf/alibaba_uncore: Assign parents for event_source device
  perf/arm_pmu: Assign parents for event_source devices
  perf/imx_ddr: Assign parents for event_source devices
  perf/qcom: Assign parents for event_source devices
  Documentation: qcom-pmu: Use /sys/bus/event_source/devices paths
  perf/riscv: Assign parents for event_source devices
  perf/thunderx2: Assign parents for event_source devices
  Documentation: thunderx2-pmu: Use /sys/bus/event_source/devices paths
  perf/xgene: Assign parents for event_source devices
  Documentation: xgene-pmu: Use /sys/bus/event_source/devices paths
  ...

* for-next/mm:
  arm64/mm: Fix pud_user_accessible_page() for PGTABLE_LEVELS <= 2
  arm64/mm: Add uffd write-protect support
  arm64/mm: Move PTE_PRESENT_INVALID to overlay PTE_NG
  arm64/mm: Remove PTE_PROT_NONE bit
  arm64/mm: generalize PMD_PRESENT_INVALID for all levels
  arm64: mm: Don't remap pgtables for allocate vs populate
  arm64: mm: Batch dsb and isb when populating pgtables
  arm64: mm: Don't remap pgtables per-cont(pte|pmd) block

* for-next/misc:
  arm64: simplify arch_static_branch/_jump function
  arm64: Add the arm64.no32bit_el0 command line option
  arm64: defer clearing DAIF.D
  arm64: assembler: update stale comment for disable_step_tsk
  arm64/sysreg: Update PIE permission encodings
  arm64: Add Neoverse-V2 part
  arm64: Remove unnecessary irqflags alternative.h include

* for-next/kbuild:
  arm64: boot: Support Flat Image Tree
  arm64: Add BOOT_TARGETS variable

* for-next/acpi:
  arm64: acpi: Honour firmware_signature field of FACS, if it exists
  ACPICA: Detect FACS even for hardware reduced platforms

The recent change to use pud_valid() as part of the implementation of
pud_user_accessible_page() fails to build when PGTABLE_LEVELS <= 2
because pud_valid() is not defined in that case.

Fix this by defining pud_valid() to false for this case. This means that
pud_user_accessible_page() will correctly always return false for this
config.

Fixes: f0f5863a ("arm64/mm: Remove PTE_PROT_NONE bit")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405082221.43rfWxz5-lkp@intel.com/Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240509122844.563320-1-ryan.roberts@arm.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Let's use the newly-free PTE SW bit (58) to add support for uffd-wp.

The standard handlers are implemented for set/test/clear for both pte
and pmd. Additionally we must also track the uffd-wp state as a pte swp
bit, so use a free swap pte bit (3).
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240503144604.151095-5-ryan.roberts@arm.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

PTE_PRESENT_INVALID was previously occupying bit 59, which when a PTE is
valid can either be IGNORED, PBHA[0] or AttrIndex[3], depending on the
HW configuration. In practice this is currently not a problem because
PTE_PRESENT_INVALID can only be 1 when PTE_VALID=0 and upstream Linux
always requires the bit set to 0 for a valid pte.

However, if in future Linux wants to use the field (e.g. AttrIndex[3])
then we could end up with confusion when PTE_PRESENT_INVALID comes along
and corrupts the field - we would ideally want to preserve it even for
an invalid (but present) pte.

The other problem with bit 59 is that it prevents the offset field of a
swap entry within a swap pte from growing beyond 51 bits. By moving
PTE_PRESENT_INVALID to a low bit we can lay the swap pte out so that the
offset field could grow to 52 bits in future.

So let's move PTE_PRESENT_INVALID to overlay PTE_NG (bit 11).

There is no need to persist NG for a present-invalid entry; it is always
set for user mappings and is not used by SW to derive any state from the
pte. PTE_NS was considered instead of PTE_NG, but it is RES0 for
non-secure SW, so there is a chance that future architecture may
allocate the bit and we may therefore need to persist that bit for
present-invalid ptes.

These are both marginal benefits, but make things a bit tidier in my
opinion.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240503144604.151095-4-ryan.roberts@arm.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Currently the PTE_PRESENT_INVALID and PTE_PROT_NONE functionality
explicitly occupy 2 bits in the PTE when PTE_VALID/PMD_SECT_VALID is
clear. This has 2 significant consequences:

  - PTE_PROT_NONE consumes a precious SW PTE bit that could be used for
    other things.
  - The swap pte layout must reserve those same 2 bits and ensure they
    are both always zero for a swap pte. It would be nice to reclaim at
    least one of those bits.

But PTE_PRESENT_INVALID, which since the previous patch, applies
uniformly to page/block descriptors at any level when PTE_VALID is
clear, can already give us most of what PTE_PROT_NONE requires: If it is
set, then the pte is still considered present; pte_present() returns
true and all the fields in the pte follow the HW interpretation (e.g. SW
can safely call pte_pfn(), etc). But crucially, the HW treats the pte as
invalid and will fault if it hits.

So let's remove PTE_PROT_NONE entirely and instead represent PROT_NONE
as a present but invalid pte (PTE_VALID=0, PTE_PRESENT_INVALID=1) with
PTE_USER=0 and PTE_UXN=1. This is a unique combination that is not used
anywhere else.

The net result is a clearer, simpler, more generic encoding scheme that
applies uniformly to all levels. Additionally we free up a PTE SW bit
and a swap pte bit (bit 58 in both cases).
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240503144604.151095-3-ryan.roberts@arm.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

As preparation for the next patch, which frees up the PTE_PROT_NONE
present pte and swap pte bit, generalize PMD_PRESENT_INVALID to
PTE_PRESENT_INVALID. This will then be used to mark PROT_NONE ptes (and
entries at any other level) in the next patch.

While we're at it, fix up the swap pte format comment to include
PTE_PRESENT_INVALID. This is not new, it just wasn't previously
documented.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240503144604.151095-2-ryan.roberts@arm.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Extracted the jump table definition code from the arch_static_branch and
arch_static_branch_jump functions into a macro JUMP_TABLE_ENTRY to reduce
code duplication.
Signed-off-by: George Guo <guodongtai@kylinos.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240430085655.2798551-2-dongtai.guo@linux.devSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Currently, userstacktrace is unsupported for ftrace and uprobe
tracers on arm64. This patch uses the perf_callchain_user() code
as blueprint to implement the arch_stack_walk_user() which add
userstacktrace support on arm64.
Meanwhile, we can use arch_stack_walk_user() to simplify the
implementation of perf_callchain_user().
This patch is tested pass with ftrace, uprobe and perf tracers
profiling userstacktrace cases.
Tested-by: chenqiwu <qiwu.chen@transsion.com>
Signed-off-by: chenqiwu <qiwu.chen@transsion.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231219022229.10230-1-qiwu.chen@transsion.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Introducing the field 'el0' to the idreg-override for register
ID_AA64PFR0_EL1. This field is also aliased to the new kernel
command line option 'arm64.no32bit_el0' as a more recognizable
and mnemonic name to disable the execution of 32 bit userspace
applications (i.e. avoid Aarch32 execution state in EL0) from
kernel command line.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240207105847.7739-1-andrea.porta@suse.com/Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240429102833.6426-1-andrea.porta@suse.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

pci_alloc_irq_vectors() allocates an irq vector. When devm_add_action()
fails, the irq vector is not freed, which leads to a memory leak.

Replace the devm_add_action with devm_add_action_or_reset to ensure
the irq vector can be destroyed when it fails.

Fixes: 66637ab1 ("drivers/perf: hisi: add driver for HNS3 PMU")
Signed-off-by: Hao Chen <chenhao418@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Junhao He <hejunhao3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jijie Shao <shaojijie@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240425124627.13764-4-hejunhao3@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

The perf tool allows users to create event groups through following
cmd [1], but the driver does not check whether the array index is out
of bounds when writing data to the event_group array. If the number of
events in an event_group is greater than HNS3_PMU_MAX_HW_EVENTS, the
memory write overflow of event_group array occurs.

Add array index check to fix the possible array out of bounds violation,
and return directly when write new events are written to array bounds.

There are 9 different events in an event_group.
[1] perf stat -e '{pmu/event1/, ... ,pmu/event9/}

Fixes: 66637ab1 ("drivers/perf: hisi: add driver for HNS3 PMU")
Signed-off-by: Junhao He <hejunhao3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao Chen <chenhao418@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jijie Shao <shaojijie@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240425124627.13764-3-hejunhao3@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

The perf tool allows users to create event groups through following
cmd [1], but the driver does not check whether the array index is out of
bounds when writing data to the event_group array. If the number of events
in an event_group is greater than HISI_PCIE_MAX_COUNTERS, the memory write
overflow of event_group array occurs.

Add array index check to fix the possible array out of bounds violation,
and return directly when write new events are written to array bounds.

There are 9 different events in an event_group.
[1] perf stat -e '{pmu/event1/, ... ,pmu/event9/}'

Fixes: 8404b0fb ("drivers/perf: hisi: Add driver for HiSilicon PCIe PMU")
Signed-off-by: Junhao He <hejunhao3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jijie Shao <shaojijie@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240425124627.13764-2-hejunhao3@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

There is a 'malloc' call, which can be unsuccessful.
This patch will add the malloc failure checking
to avoid possible null dereference and give more information
about test fail reasons.
Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240423082102.2018886-1-chentao@kylinos.cnSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

For historical reasons we unmask debug exceptions in __cpu_setup(), but
it's not necessary to unmask debug exceptions this early in the
boot/idle entry paths. It would be better to unmask debug exceptions
later in C code as this simplifies the current code and will make it
easier to rework exception masking logic to handle non-DAIF bits in
future (e.g. PSTATE.{ALLINT,PM}).

We started clearing DAIF.D in __cpu_setup() in commit:

  2ce39ad1 ("arm64: debug: unmask PSTATE.D earlier")

At the time, we needed to ensure that DAIF.D was clear on the primary
CPU before scheduling and preemption were possible, and chose to do this
in __cpu_setup() so that this occurred in the same place for primary and
secondary CPUs. As we cannot handle debug exceptions this early, we
placed an ISB between initializing MDSCR_EL1 and clearing DAIF.D so that
no exceptions should be triggered.

Subsequently we rewrote the return-from-{idle,suspend} paths to use
__cpu_setup() in commit:

  cabe1c81 ("arm64: Change cpu_resume() to enable mmu early then access sleep_sp by va")

... which allowed for earlier use of the MMU and had the desirable
property of using the same code to reset the CPU in the cold and warm
boot paths. This introduced a bug: DAIF.D was clear while
cpu_do_resume() restored MDSCR_EL1 and other control registers (e.g.
breakpoint/watchpoint control/value registers), and so we could
unexpectedly take debug exceptions.

We fixed that in commit:

  744c6c37 ("arm64: kernel: Fix unmasked debug exceptions when restoring mdscr_el1")

... by having cpu_do_resume() use the `disable_dbg` macro to set DAIF.D
before restoring MDSCR_EL1 and other control registers. This relies on
DAIF.D being subsequently cleared again in cpu_resume().

Subsequently we reworked DAIF masking in commit:

  0fbeb318 ("arm64: explicitly mask all exceptions")

... where we began enforcing a policy that DAIF.D being set implies all
other DAIF bits are set, and so e.g. we cannot take an IRQ while DAIF.D
is set. As part of this the use of `disable_dbg` in cpu_resume() was
replaced with `disable_daif` for consistency with the rest of the
kernel.

These days, there's no need to clear DAIF.D early within __cpu_setup():

* setup_arch() clears DAIF.DA before scheduling and preemption are
  possible on the primary CPU, avoiding the problem we we originally
  trying to work around.

  Note: DAIF.IF get cleared later when interrupts are enabled for the
  first time.

* secondary_start_kernel() clears all DAIF bits before scheduling and
  preemption are possible on secondary CPUs.

  Note: with pseudo-NMI, the PMR is initialized here before any DAIF
  bits are cleared. Similar will be necessary for the architectural NMI.

* cpu_suspend() restores all DAIF bits when returning from idle,
  ensuring that we don't unexpectedly leave DAIF.D clear or set.

  Note: with pseudo-NMI, the PMR is initialized here before DAIF is
  cleared. Similar will be necessary for the architectural NMI.

This patch removes the unmasking of debug exceptions from __cpu_setup(),
relying on the above locations to initialize DAIF. This allows some
other cleanups:

* It is no longer necessary for cpu_resume() to explicitly mask debug
  (or other) exceptions, as it is always called with all DAIF bits set.
  Thus we drop the use of `disable_daif`.

* The `enable_dbg` macro is no longer used, and so is dropped.

* It is no longer necessary to have an ISB immediately after
  initializing MDSCR_EL1 in __cpu_setup(), and we can revert to relying
  on the context synchronization that occurs when the MMU is enabled
  between __cpu_setup() and code which clears DAIF.D

Comments are added to setup_arch() and secondary_start_kernel() to
explain the initial unmasking of the DAIF bits.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240422113523.4070414-3-mark.rutland@arm.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

A comment in the disable_step_tsk macro refers to synchronising with
enable_dbg, as historically the entry used enable_dbg to unmask debug
exceptions after disabling single-stepping.

These days the unmasking happens in entry-common.c via
local_daif_restore() or local_daif_inherit(), so the comment is stale.
This logic is likely to chang in future, so it would be best to avoid
referring to those macros specifically.

Update the comment to take this into account, and describe it in terms
of clearing DAIF.D so that it doesn't macro where this logic lives nor
what it is called.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240422113523.4070414-2-mark.rutland@arm.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Fix left shift overflow issue when the parameter idx is greater than or
equal to 8 in the calculation of perm in PIRx_ELx_PERM macro.

Fix this by modifying the encoding to use a long integer type.
Signed-off-by: Shiqi Liu <shiqiliu@hust.edu.cn>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240421063328.29710-1-shiqiliu@hust.edu.cnSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Remove unused parameter i in tpidr2.c main function.
Signed-off-by: xieming <xieming@kylinos.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240422015730.89805-1-xieming@kylinos.cnSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Currently the PMU device appears directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parent to be the platform device.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/Acked-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-24-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Currently the PMU device appears directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parent to be the platform device.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-23-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Currently the PMU device appears directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parent to be the platform device.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-22-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Currently the PMU device appears directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parent to be the platform device.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-21-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Currently the PMU device appears directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parent to be the platform device.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/Acked-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-20-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Currently the PMU device appears directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parent to be the platform device.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-19-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Currently the PMU device appears directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parent to be the platform device.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/Reviewed-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-18-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Currently the PMU device appears directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parent to be the platform device.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-17-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Currently all this device appear directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parent to be the platform device.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Cc: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-16-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Currently all these devices appear directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parents to be the platform devices.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-15-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

To allow setting an appropriate parent for the struct pmu device
remove existing references to /sys/devices/ path.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-14-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Currently all these devices appear directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parents to be the appropriate platform devices.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Cc: Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>
CC: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-13-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Currently all these devices appear directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parents to be the platform device.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Cc: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-12-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

To allow setting an appropriate parent for the struct pmu device
remove existing references to /sys/devices/ path.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-11-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Currently all these devices appear directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parents to be the hardware related struct device.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Cc: Khuong Dinh <khuong@os.amperecomputing.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-10-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

To allow setting an appropriate parent for the struct pmu device
remove existing references to /sys/devices/ path.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-9-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Currently all these devices appear directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parents to be the platform device.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-8-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Currently all these devices appear directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parents to be the platform device.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/Reviewed-by: Jiucheng Xu <jiucheng.xu@amlogic.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-7-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>