- 10 Mar, 2014 40 commits
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Use the newly created btrfs_workqueue_struct to replace the original fs_info->workers Signed-off-by:
Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by:
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
Qu Wenruo authored
The original btrfs_workers has thresholding functions to dynamically create or destroy kthreads. Though there is no such function in kernel workqueue because the worker is not created manually, we can still use the workqueue_set_max_active to simulated the behavior, mainly to achieve a better HDD performance by setting a high threshold on submit_workers. (Sadly, no resource can be saved) So in this patch, extra workqueue pending counters are introduced to dynamically change the max active of each btrfs_workqueue_struct, hoping to restore the behavior of the original thresholding function. Also, workqueue_set_max_active use a mutex to protect workqueue_struct, which is not meant to be called too frequently, so a new interval mechanism is applied, that will only call workqueue_set_max_active after a count of work is queued. Hoping to balance both the random and sequence performance on HDD. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Add high priority function to btrfs_workqueue. This is implemented by embedding a btrfs_workqueue into a btrfs_workqueue and use some helper functions to differ the normal priority wq and high priority wq. So the high priority wq is completely independent from the normal workqueue. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Use kernel workqueue to implement a new btrfs_workqueue_struct, which has the ordering execution feature like the btrfs_worker. The func is executed in a concurrency way, and the ordred_func/ordered_free is executed in the sequence them are queued after the corresponding func is done. The new btrfs_workqueue works much like the original one, one workqueue for normal work and a list for ordered work. When a work is queued, ordered work will be added to the list and helper function will be queued into the workqueue. The helper function will execute a normal work and then check and execute as many ordered work as possible in the sequence they were queued. At this patch, high priority work queue or thresholding is not added yet. The high priority feature and thresholding will be added in the following patches. Signed-off-by:
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
The struct async_sched is not used by any codes and can be removed. Signed-off-by:
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Tested-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
It is really unnecessary to search tree again for @gen, @mode and @rdev in the case of REG inodes' creation, as we've got btrfs_inode_item in sctx, and @gen, @mode and @rdev can easily be fetched. Signed-off-by:
Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
We can not release the reserved metadata space for the first write if we find the write position is pre-allocated. Because the kernel might write the data on the disk before we do the second write but after the can-nocow check, if we release the space for the first write, we might fail to update the metadata because of no space. Fix this problem by end nocow write if there is dirty data in the range whose space is pre-allocated. Signed-off-by:
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
The write range may not be sector-aligned, for example: |--------|--------| <- write range, sector-unaligned, size: 2blocks |--------|--------|--------| <- correct lock range, size: 3blocks But according to the old code, we used the size of write range to calculate the lock range directly, not considered the offset, we would get a wrong lock range: |--------|--------| <- write range, sector-unaligned, size: 2blocks |--------|--------| <- wrong lock range, size: 2blocks And besides that, the old code also had the same problem when calculating the real write size. Correct them. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
In "btrfs: send: lower memory requirements in common case" the code to save the old_buf_len was incorrectly moved to a wrong place and broke the original logic. Reported-by:
Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
While droping extent map structures from the extent cache that cover our target range, we would remove each extent map structure from the red black tree and then add either 1 or 2 new extent map structures if the former extent map covered sections outside our target range. This change simply attempts to replace the existing extent map structure with a new one that covers the subsection we're not interested in, instead of doing a red black remove operation followed by an insertion operation. The number of elements in an inode's extent map tree can get very high for large files under random writes. For example, while running the following test: sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=1 --file-total-size=10G \ --file-test-mode=rndrw --num-threads=32 --file-block-size=32768 \ --max-requests=500000 --file-rw-ratio=2 [prepare|run] I captured the following histogram capturing the number of extent_map items in the red black tree while that test was running: Count: 122462 Range: 1.000 - 172231.000; Mean: 96415.831; Median: 101855.000; Stddev: 49700.981 Percentiles: 90th: 160120.000; 95th: 166335.000; 99th: 171070.000 1.000 - 5.231: 452 | 5.231 - 187.392: 87 | 187.392 - 585.911: 206 | 585.911 - 1827.438: 623 | 1827.438 - 5695.245: 1962 # 5695.245 - 17744.861: 6204 #### 17744.861 - 55283.764: 21115 ############ 55283.764 - 172231.000: 91813 ##################################################### Benchmark: sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=1 --file-total-size=10G --file-test-mode=rndwr \ --num-threads=64 --file-block-size=32768 --max-requests=0 --max-time=60 \ --file-io-mode=sync --file-fsync-freq=0 [prepare|run] Before this change: 122.1Mb/sec After this change: 125.07Mb/sec (averages of 5 test runs) Test machine: quad core intel i5-3570K, 32Gb of ram, SSD Signed-off-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
When we split an extent state there's no need to start the rbtree search from the root node - we can start it from the original extent state node, since we would end up in its subtree if we do the search starting at the root node anyway. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
We don't need to have an unsigned int field in the extent_map struct to tell us whether the extent map is in the inode's extent_map tree or not. We can use the rb_node struct field and the RB_CLEAR_NODE and RB_EMPTY_NODE macros to achieve the same task. This reduces sizeof(struct extent_map) from 152 bytes to 144 bytes (on a 64 bits system). Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
We won't change commit root, skip locking dance with commit root when walking backrefs, this can speed up btrfs send operations. Signed-off-by:
Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
check if @scrubs_running=@scrubs_paused condition inside wait_event() is not an atomic operation which means we may inc/dec @scrub_running/ paused at any time. Let's wake up @scrub_pause_wait as much as we can to let commit transaction blocked less. An example below: Thread1 Thread2 |->scrub_blocked_if_needed() |->scrub_pending_trans_workers_inc |->increase @scrub_paused |->increase @scrub_running |->wake up scrub_pause_wait list |->scrub blocked |->increase @scrub_paused Thread3 is commiting transaction which is blocked at btrfs_scrub_pause(). So after Thread2 increase @scrub_paused, we meet the condition @scrub_paused=@scrub_running, but transaction will be still blocked until another calling to wake up @scrub_pause_wait. Signed-off-by: -
Wang Shilong authored
If we fail to commit transaction, we'd better cancel scrub operations. Suggested-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
commit cb7ab021 cause a following deadlock found by xfstests,btrfs/011: Thread1 is commiting transaction which is blocked at btrfs_scrub_pause(). Thread2 is calling btrfs_file_aio_write() which has held inode's @i_mutex and commit transaction(blocked because Thread1 is committing transaction). Thread3 is copy_nocow_page worker which will also try to hold inode @i_mutex, so thread3 will wait Thread1 finished. Thread4 is waiting pending workers finished which will wait Thread3 finished. So the problem is like this: Thread1--->Thread4--->Thread3--->Thread2---->Thread1 Deadlock happens! we fix it by letting Thread1 go firstly, which means we won't block transaction commit while we are waiting pending workers finished. Reported-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
btrfs_scrub_continue() will be called when cleaning up transaction.However, this can only be called if btrfs_scrub_pause() is called before. Signed-off-by:
-
Sachin Kamat authored
PTR_RET is deprecated. Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO instead. While at it also include missing err.h header. Signed-off-by:
Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When doing an incremental send, if we had a directory pending a move/rename operation and none of its parents, except for the immediate parent, were pending a move/rename, after processing the directory's references, we would be issuing utimes, chown and chmod intructions against am outdated path - a path which matched the one in the parent root. This change also simplifies a bit the code that deals with building a path for a directory which has a move/rename operation delayed. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/e $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/f $ chmod 0777 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/f /mnt/btrfs/a/b/f2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/btrfs/a/b/f2/e2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ chmod 0700 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/f2/e2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: chmod a/b/c/d/e failed. No such file or directory A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
Just comparing the pointers (logical disk addresses) of the btree nodes is not completely bullet proof, we have to check if their generation numbers match too. It is guaranteed that a COW operation will result in a block with a different logical disk address than the original block's address, but over time we can reuse that former logical disk address. For example, creating a 2Gb filesystem on a loop device, and having a script running in a loop always updating the access timestamp of a file, resulted in the same logical disk address being reused for the same fs btree block in about only 4 minutes. This could make us skip entire subtrees when doing an incremental send (which is currently the only user of btrfs_compare_trees). However the odds of getting 2 blocks at the same tree level, with the same logical disk address, equal first slot keys and different generations, should hopefully be very low. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
When doing an incremental send, if we delete a directory that has N > 1 hardlinks for the same file and that file has the highest inode number inside the directory contents, an incremental send would send N times an rmdir operation against the directory. This made the btrfs receive command fail on the second rmdir instruction, as the target directory didn't exist anymore. Steps to reproduce the issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ echo 'ola mundo' > /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/foo.txt $ ln /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/foo.txt /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/bar.txt $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ rm -f /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/foo.txt $ rm -f /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/bar.txt $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. No such file or directory A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
This fixes yet one more case not caught by the commit titled: Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send In this case, even before the initial full send, we have a directory which is a child of a directory with a higher inode number. Then we perform the initial send, and after we rename both the child and the parent, without moving them around. After doing these 2 renames, an incremental send sent a rename instruction for the child directory which contained an invalid "from" path (referenced the parent's old name, not the new one), which made the btrfs receive command fail. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ mv /mnt/btrfs/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umout /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: "ERROR: rename a/b/c/d -> a/b/x/y failed. No such file or directory" A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
If we punch beyond the size of an inode, we'll correctly remove any prealloc extents, but we'll also insert file extent items representing holes (disk bytenr == 0) that start with a key offset that lies beyond the inode's size and are not contiguous with the last file extent item. Example: $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "truncate 118811" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $XFS_IO_PROG -c "fpunch 582007 864596" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0x0d -b 39987 92267 39987" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo btrfs-debug-tree output: item 4 key (257 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 15885 itemsize 160 inode generation 6 transid 6 size 132254 block group 0 mode 100600 links 1 item 5 key (257 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 15872 itemsize 13 inode ref index 2 namelen 3 name: foo item 6 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 15819 itemsize 53 extent data disk byte 0 nr 0 gen 6 extent data offset 0 nr 90112 ram 122880 extent compression 0 item 7 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 90112) itemoff 15766 itemsize 53 extent data disk byte 12845056 nr 4096 gen 6 extent data offset 0 nr 45056 ram 45056 extent compression 2 item 8 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 585728) itemoff 15713 itemsize 53 extent data disk byte 0 nr 0 gen 6 extent data offset 0 nr 860160 ram 860160 extent compression 0 The last extent item, which represents a hole, is useless as it lies beyond the inode's size. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
The argument last wasn't used, all callers supplied a NULL value for it. Also removed unnecessary intermediate storage of the result of key comparisons. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When we didn't find the exact ref head we were looking for, if return_bigger != 0 we set a new search key to match either the next node after the last one we found or the first one in the ref heads rb tree, and then did another full tree search. For both cases this ended up being pointless as we would end up returning an entry we already had before repeating the search. Signed-off-by:
-
Justin Maggard authored
Now that we can adjust the commit interval with a remount, we need to wake up the transaction thread or else he will continue to sleep until the previous transaction interval has elapsed before waking up. So, if we go from a large commit interval to something smaller, the transaction thread will not wake up until the large interval has expired. This also causes the cleaner thread to stay sleeping, since it gets woken up by the transaction thread. Fix it by simply waking up the transaction thread during a remount. Signed-off-by:
Justin Maggard <jmaggard10@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
If the log sync fails, there is something wrong in the log tree, we should not continue to join the log transaction and log the metadata. What we should do is to do a full commit. This patch fixes this problem by setting ->last_trans_log_full_commit to the current transaction id, it will tell the tasks not to join the log transaction, and do a full commit. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
We might commit the log sub-transaction which didn't contain the metadata we logged. It was because we didn't record the log transid and just select the current log sub-transaction to commit, but the right one might be committed by the other task already. Actually, we needn't do anything and it is safe that we go back directly in this case. This patch improves the log sync by the above idea. We record the transid of the log sub-transaction in which we log the metadata, and the transid of the log sub-transaction we have committed. If the committed transid is >= the transid we record when logging the metadata, we just go back. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
It is possible that many tasks sync the log tree at the same time, but only one task can do the sync work, the others will wait for it. But those wait tasks didn't get the result of the log sync, and returned 0 when they ended the wait. It caused those tasks skipped the error handle, and the serious problem was they told the users the file sync succeeded but in fact they failed. This patch fixes this problem by introducing a log context structure, we insert it into the a global list. When the sync fails, we will set the error number of every log context in the list, then the waiting tasks get the error number of the log context and handle the error if need. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
The log trans id is initialized to be 0 every time we create a log tree, and the log tree need be re-created after a new transaction is started, it means the log trans id is unlikely to be a huge number, so we can use signed integer instead of unsigned long integer to save a bit space. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
Mutex unlock implies certain memory barriers to make sure all the memory operation completes before the unlock, and the next mutex lock implies memory barriers to make sure the all the memory happens after the lock. So it is a full memory barrier(smp_mb), we needn't add memory barriers. Remove them. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
The old code would start the log transaction even the log tree init failed, it was unnecessary. Fix it. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
We may abort the wait earlier if ->last_trans_log_full_commit was set to the current transaction id, at this case, we need commit the current transaction instead of the log sub-transaction. But the current code didn't tell the caller to do it (return 0, not -EAGAIN). Fix it. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
->last_trans_log_full_commit may be changed by the other tasks without lock, so we need prevent the compiler from the optimize access just like tmp = fs_info->last_trans_log_full_commit if (tmp == ...) ... <do something> if (tmp == ...) ... In fact, we need get the new value of ->last_trans_log_full_commit during the second access. Fix it by ACCESS_ONCE(). Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
So after transaction is aborted, we need to cleanup inode resources by calling btrfs_invalidate_inodes(), and btrfs_invalidate_inodes() hopes roots' refs to be zero in old times and sets a WARN_ON(), however, this is not always true within cleaning up transaction, so we get to detect transaction abortion and not warn at all. Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
[13654.480669] ====================================================== [13654.480905] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [13654.481003] 3.12.0+ #4 Tainted: G W O [13654.481060] ------------------------------------------------------- [13654.481060] btrfs-transacti/9347 is trying to acquire lock: [13654.481060] (&(&root->ordered_extent_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa02d30a1>] btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x271/0x570 [btrfs] [13654.481060] but task is already holding lock: [13654.481060] (&(&fs_info->ordered_root_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa02d3015>] btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x1e5/0x570 [btrfs] [13654.481060] which lock already depends on the new lock. [13654.481060] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [13654.481060] -> #1 (&(&fs_info->ordered_root_lock)->rlock){+.+...}: [13654.481060] [<ffffffff810c4103>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x130 [13654.481060] [<ffffffff81689991>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x50 [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02f011b>] __btrfs_add_ordered_extent+0x39b/0x450 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02f0202>] btrfs_add_ordered_extent+0x32/0x40 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02df6aa>] run_delalloc_nocow+0x78a/0x9d0 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02dfc0d>] run_delalloc_range+0x31d/0x390 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02f7c00>] __extent_writepage+0x310/0x780 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02f830a>] extent_write_cache_pages.isra.29.constprop.48+0x29a/0x410 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02f879d>] extent_writepages+0x4d/0x70 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02d9f68>] btrfs_writepages+0x28/0x30 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffff8114be91>] do_writepages+0x21/0x50 [13654.481060] [<ffffffff81140d49>] __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x59/0x60 [13654.481060] [<ffffffff81140e13>] filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x13/0x20 [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02f1db9>] btrfs_wait_ordered_range+0x49/0x140 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa0318fe2>] __btrfs_write_out_cache+0x682/0x8b0 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa031952d>] btrfs_write_out_cache+0x8d/0xe0 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02c7083>] btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x593/0x680 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa0345307>] commit_cowonly_roots+0x14b/0x20d [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02d7c1a>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x43a/0x9d0 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa030061a>] btrfs_create_uuid_tree+0x5a/0x100 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02d5a8a>] open_ctree+0x21da/0x2210 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02ab6fe>] btrfs_mount+0x68e/0x870 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffff811b2409>] mount_fs+0x39/0x1b0 [13654.481060] [<ffffffff811cd653>] vfs_kern_mount+0x63/0xf0 [13654.481060] [<ffffffff811cfcce>] do_mount+0x23e/0xa90 [13654.481060] [<ffffffff811d05a3>] SyS_mount+0x83/0xc0 [13654.481060] [<ffffffff81692b52>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [13654.481060] -> #0 (&(&root->ordered_extent_lock)->rlock){+.+...}: [13654.481060] [<ffffffff810c340a>] __lock_acquire+0x150a/0x1a70 [13654.481060] [<ffffffff810c4103>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x130 [13654.481060] [<ffffffff81689991>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x50 [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02d30a1>] btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x271/0x570 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02d35ce>] transaction_kthread+0x22e/0x270 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffff81079efa>] kthread+0xea/0xf0 [13654.481060] [<ffffffff81692aac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [13654.481060] other info that might help us debug this: [13654.481060] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [13654.481060] CPU0 CPU1 [13654.481060] ---- ---- [13654.481060] lock(&(&fs_info->ordered_root_lock)->rlock); [13654.481060] lock(&(&root->ordered_extent_lock)->rlock); [13654.481060] lock(&(&fs_info->ordered_root_lock)->rlock); [13654.481060] lock(&(&root->ordered_extent_lock)->rlock); [13654.481060] *** DEADLOCK *** [...] ====================================================== btrfs_destroy_all_ordered_extents() gets &fs_info->ordered_root_lock __BEFORE__ acquiring &root->ordered_extent_lock, while btrfs_[add,remove]_ordered_extent() acquires &fs_info->ordered_root_lock __AFTER__ getting &root->ordered_extent_lock. This patch fixes the above problem. Signed-off-by: -
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
This is an extension to my previous commit titled: "Btrfs: faster file extent item replace operations" (hash 1acae57b) Instead of inserting the new file extent item if we deleted existing file extent items covering our target file range, also allow to insert the new file extent item if we didn't find any existing items to delete and replace_extent != 0, since in this case our caller would do another tree search to insert the new file extent item anyway, therefore just combine the two tree searches into a single one, saving cpu time, reducing lock contention and reducing btree node/leaf COW operations. This covers the case where applications keep doing tail append writes to files, which for example is the case of Apache CouchDB (its database and view index files are always open with O_APPEND). Signed-off-by:
-
Stanislaw Gruszka authored
In case we do not refill, we can overwrite cur pointer from prio_head by one from not prioritized head, what looks as something that was not intended. This change make we always take works from prio_head first until it's not empty. Signed-off-by:
Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl> Signed-off-by:
-
