- 17 Sep, 2014 40 commits
-
-
Miao Xie authored
Signed-off-by:
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
Miao Xie authored
The member variants - num_can_discard - of fs_devices structure are set, but no one use them to do anything. so remove them. Signed-off-by:
-
Li RongQing authored
This comments became wrong after c3c532[bdi: add helper function for doing init and register of a bdi for a file system], so remove them. Signed-off-by:
Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When replaying a directory from the fsync log, if a directory entry exists both in the fs/subvol tree and in the log, the directory's inode got its i_size updated incorrectly, accounting for the dentry's name twice. Reproducer, from a test for xfstests: _scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full 2>&1 _init_flakey _mount_flakey touch $SCRATCH_MNT/foo sync touch $SCRATCH_MNT/bar xfs_io -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT xfs_io -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/bar _load_flakey_table $FLAKEY_DROP_WRITES _unmount_flakey _load_flakey_table $FLAKEY_ALLOW_WRITES _mount_flakey [ -f $SCRATCH_MNT/foo ] || echo "file foo is missing" [ -f $SCRATCH_MNT/bar ] || echo "file bar is missing" _unmount_flakey _check_scratch_fs $FLAKEY_DEV The filesystem check at the end failed with the message: "root 5 root dir 256 error". A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by:Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
One of my tests shows that when we really don't have space to reclaim via flush_space and also run out of space, this async reclaim work loops on adding itself into the workqueue and keeps writing something to disk according to iostat's results, and these writes mainly comes from commit_transaction which writes super_block. This's unacceptable as it can be bad to disks, especially memeory storages. This adds a check to avoid the above situation. Signed-off-by:
Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We have been iterating all references for each extent we have in a file when we do fiemap to see if it is shared. This is fine when you have a few clones or a few snapshots, but when you have 5k snapshots suddenly fiemap just sits there and stares at you. So add btrfs_check_shared which will use the backref walking code but will short circuit as soon as it finds a root or inode that doesn't match the one we currently have. This makes fiemap on my testbox go from looking at me blankly for a day to spitting out actual output in a reasonable amount of time. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
The behaviour of a 'chattr -c' consists of getting the current flags, clearing the FS_COMPR_FL bit and then sending the result to the set flags ioctl - this means the bit FS_NOCOMP_FL isn't set in the flags passed to the ioctl. This results in the compression property not being cleared from the inode - it was cleared only if the bit FS_NOCOMP_FL was set in the received flags. Reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt && cd /mnt $ mkdir a $ chattr +c a $ touch a/file $ lsattr a/file --------c------- a/file $ chattr -c a $ touch a/file2 $ lsattr a/file2 --------c------- a/file2 $ lsattr -d a ---------------- a Reported-by:Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
btrfs-transacion:5657 [stack snip] btrfs_bio_map() btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked() percpu_counter_inc(&fs_info->bio_counter) ###bio_counter > 0(A) __btrfs_bio_map() btrfs_dev_replace_lock() mutex_lock(dev_replace->lock) ###wait mutex(B) btrfs:32612 [stack snip] btrfs_dev_replace_start() btrfs_dev_replace_lock() mutex_lock(dev_replace->lock) ###hold mutex(B) btrfs_dev_replace_finishing() btrfs_rm_dev_replace_blocked() wait until percpu_counter_sum == 0 ###wait on bio_counter(A) This bug can be triggered quite easily by the following test script: http://pastebin.com/MQmb37Cy This patch will fix the ABBA problem by calling btrfs_dev_replace_unlock() before btrfs_rm_dev_replace_blocked(). The consistency of btrfs devices list and their superblocks is protected by device_list_mutex, not btrfs_dev_replace_lock/unlock(). So it is safe the move btrfs_dev_replace_unlock() before btrfs_rm_dev_replace_blocked(). Reported-by:Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
We've defined a 'offset' out of bio_for_each_segment_all. This is just a clean rename, no function changes. Signed-off-by:
-
Mark Fasheh authored
btrfs_drop_snapshot() leaves subvolume qgroup items on disk after completion. This can cause problems with snapshot creation. If a new snapshot tries to claim the deleted subvolumes id, btrfs will get -EEXIST from add_qgroup_item() and go read-only. The following commands will reproduce this problem (assume btrfs is on /dev/sda and is mounted at /btrfs) mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sda mount -t btrfs /dev/sda /btrfs/ btrfs quota enable /btrfs/ btrfs su sna /btrfs/ /btrfs/snap btrfs su de /btrfs/snap sleep 45 umount /btrfs/ mount -t btrfs /dev/sda /btrfs/ We can fix this by catching -EEXIST in add_qgroup_item() and initializing the existing items. We have the problem of orphaned relation items being on disk from an old snapshot but that is outside the scope of this patch. Signed-off-by:
Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
Use %pf instead of %p, just same as kernel workqueue tracepoints. Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
The map_start and map_len fields aren't used anywhere, so just remove them. On a x86_64 system, this reduced sizeof(struct extent_buffer) from 296 bytes to 280 bytes, and therefore 14 extent_buffer structs can now fit into a page instead of 13. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
Maximum xattr size can be up to nearly the leaf size. For an fs with a leaf size larger than the page size, using kmalloc requires allocating multiple pages that are contiguous, which might not be possible if there's heavy memory fragmentation. Therefore fallback to vmalloc if we fail to allocate with kmalloc. Also start with a smaller buffer size, since xattr values typically are smaller than a page. Reported-by:
Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com> Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Last user removed in commit "btrfs: disable strict file flushes for renames and truncates" (8d875f95). Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
While under random IO, a block group's free space cache eventually reaches a state where it has a mix of extent entries and bitmap entries representing free space regions. As later free space regions are returned to the cache, some of them are merged with existing extent entries if they are contiguous with them. But others are not merged, because despite the existence of adjacent free space regions in the cache, the merging doesn't happen because the existing free space regions are represented in bitmap extents. Even when new free space regions are merged with existing extent entries (enlarging the free space range they represent), we create chances of having after an enlarged region that is contiguous with some other region represented in a bitmap entry. Both clustered and non-clustered space allocation work by iterating over our extent and bitmap entries and skipping any that represents a region smaller then the allocation request (and giving preference to extent entries before bitmap entries). By having a contiguous free space region that is represented by 2 (or more) entries (mix of extent and bitmap entries), we end up not satisfying an allocation request with a size larger than the size of any of the entries but no larger than the sum of their sizes. Making the caller assume we're under a ENOSPC condition or force it to allocate multiple smaller space regions (as we do for file data writes), which adds extra overhead and more chances of causing fragmentation due to the smaller regions being all spread apart from each other (more likely when under concurrency). For example, if we have the following in the cache: * extent entry representing free space range: [128Mb - 256Kb, 128Mb[ * bitmap entry covering the range [128Mb, 256Mb[, but only with the bits representing the range [128Mb, 128Mb + 768Kb[ set - that is, only that space in this 128Mb area is marked as free An allocation request for 1Mb, starting at offset not greater than 128Mb - 256Kb, would fail before, despite the existence of such contiguous free space area in the cache. The caller could only allocate up to 768Kb of space at once and later another 256Kb (or vice-versa). In between each smaller allocation request, another task working on a different file/inode might come in and take that space, preventing the former task of getting a contiguous 1Mb region of free space. Therefore this change implements the ability to move free space from bitmap entries into existing and new free space regions represented with extent entries. This is done when a space region is added to the cache. A test was added to the sanity tests that explains in detail the issue too. Some performance test results with compilebench on a 4 cores machine, with 32Gb of ram and using an HDD follow. Test: compilebench -D /mnt -i 30 -r 1000 --makej Before this change: intial create total runs 30 avg 69.02 MB/s (user 0.28s sys 0.57s) compile total runs 30 avg 314.96 MB/s (user 0.12s sys 0.25s) read compiled tree total runs 3 avg 27.14 MB/s (user 1.52s sys 0.90s) delete compiled tree total runs 30 avg 3.14 seconds (user 0.15s sys 0.66s) After this change: intial create total runs 30 avg 68.37 MB/s (user 0.29s sys 0.55s) compile total runs 30 avg 382.83 MB/s (user 0.12s sys 0.24s) read compiled tree total runs 3 avg 27.82 MB/s (user 1.45s sys 0.97s) delete compiled tree total runs 30 avg 3.18 seconds (user 0.17s sys 0.65s) Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
we are assigning number_devices to the total_bytes, that's very confusing for a moment Signed-off-by:
Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
there is no matching open parenthesis for the closing parenthesis Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
seed fs devices don't participate as rw_device, so don't increment rw_devices when the device being handled belongs to a seed fs. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
When we replace all the seed device in the system there is no point in just keeping the btrfs_fs_devices with out any device Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
We are not updating sprout fs seed pointer when all seed device is replaced. This patch will check if all seed device has been replaced and then update the sprout pointer accordingly. Same reproducer as in the previous patch would apply here. And notice that btrfs_close_device will check if seed fs is present and spits out the error with out this patch. int btrfs_close_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices) { :: seed_devices = fs_devices->seed; :: while (seed_devices) { fs_devices = seed_devices; seed_devices = fs_devices->seed; __btrfs_close_devices(fs_devices); free_fs_devices(fs_devices); } Signed-off-by: -
Anand Jain authored
reproducer: reproducer: mount /dev/sdb /btrfs btrfs dev add /dev/sdc /btrfs btrfs rep start -B /dev/sdb /dev/sdd /btrfs umount /btrfs WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3882 at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:892 __btrfs_close_devices+0x1c8/0x200 [btrfs]() which is WARN_ON(fs_devices->rw_devices); The problem here is that we did not add one to the rw_devices when we replace the seed device with a writable device. Signed-off-by: -
Anand Jain authored
reproducer: mount /dev/sdb /btrfs btrfs dev add /dev/sdc /btrfs btrfs rep start -B /dev/sdb /dev/sdd /btrfs umount /btrfs WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 12661 at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:891 __btrfs_close_devices+0x1b0/0x200 [btrfs]() :: __btrfs_close_devices() :: WARN_ON(fs_devices->open_devices); After the seed device has been replaced the new target device is no more a seed device. So we need to update the device numbers in the fs_devices as pointed by the fs_info. Signed-off-by: -
Anand Jain authored
There is no logical change in this patch, just a preparatory patch, so that changes can be easily reasoned. Signed-off-by:
-
Andrey Utkin authored
The issue was introduced in a79b7d4b, adding allocation of extent_workers, so this stray check is surely not meant to be a check of something else. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82021Reported-by:
Maks Naumov <maksqwe1@ukr.net> Signed-off-by:
Andrey Utkin <andrey.krieger.utkin@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
None of the uses of btrfs_search_forward() need to have the path nodes (level >= 1) read locked, only the leaf needs to be locked while the caller processes it. Therefore make it return a path with all nodes unlocked, except for the leaf. This change is motivated by the observation that during a file fsync we repeatdly call btrfs_search_forward() and process the returned leaf while upper nodes of the returned path (level >= 1) are read locked, which unnecessarily blocks other tasks that want to write to the same fs/subvol btree. Therefore instead of modifying the fsync code to unlock all nodes with level >= 1 immediately after calling btrfs_search_forward(), change btrfs_search_forward() to do it, so that it benefits all callers. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
Not sure how this escaped many eyes so far Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
BTRFS_ATTR_RW could set the mode and be inline with BTRFS_ATTR Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
All that uses BTRFS_ATTR want mode to be set at 0444 so just do it at the define. And few spacing alignments. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
we have BTRFS_ATTR define to create sysfs RO file, use that. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
If we need to cow a node, increase the write lock level and retry the tree search, there's no point of changing the node locks in our path to blocking mode, as we only waste time and unnecessarily wake up other tasks waiting on the spinning locks (just to block them again shortly after) because we release our path before repeating the tree search. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
In ctree.c:setup_items_for_insert(), we can unlock all nodes in our path before we process the leaf (shift items and data, adjust data offsets, etc). This allows for better btree concurrency, as we're often holding a write lock on at least the node at level 1. Signed-off-by:
-
Satoru Takeuchi authored
btrfs_lookup_csums_range() uses ALIGN() to check if "start" and "end + 1" are aligned to "root->sectorsize". It's better to replace these with IS_ALIGNED() for simplicity. Signed-off-by:
Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
Tracepoint trace_btrfs_normal_work_done never has an user, just cleanup it. Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
Kernel workqueue's tracepoints print the address of work_struct, while btrfs workqueue's tracepoints print the address of btrfs_work. We need a connection between this two, for example when debuging, we usually grep an address in the trace output. So it'd be better to also print work_struct in btrfs workqueue's tracepoint. Please note that we can only add this into those tracepoints whose work is still available in memory because we need to reference the work. Signed-off-by:
-
Mark Fasheh authored
We want this to debug qgroup changes on live systems. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
The member variants - latest_devid and latest_trans - of fs_devices structure are set, but no one use them to do anything. so remove them. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
The io error might happen during writing out the device stats, and the device stats information and dirty flag would be update at that time, but the current code didn't consider this case, just clear the dirty flag, it would cause that we forgot to write out the new device stats information. Fix it. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
The lock in btrfs_device structure was far away from its protected data, it would make CPU load the cache line twice when we accessed them, move them together. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
The super block generation of the seed devices is not the same as the filesystem which sprouted from them because we don't update the super block on the seed devices when we change that new filesystem. So we should not use the generation of that new filesystem to check the super block generation on the seed devices, Fix it. Signed-off-by:
-
