PerformanceTests: Update to the new hardware

  Performance tests were reconfigured on a new hardware, which is slower them
  the previous one. So this commit move the values to the new hardware based on
  the results after few days of result.

product/ERP5/tests/testSimulationElementPerformance.py

@@ -112,26 +112,26 @@ HISTORICAL_EXPECTED_MIN_MAX_TIME = {
 }
 
 EXPECTED_MIN_MAX_TIME = {
-  'Creation Of New Applied Rules': (5, 10),
+  'Creation Of New Applied Rules': (30, 35),
 
-  'Expansion of Existing Applied Rules': (5, 10),
+  'Expansion of Existing Applied Rules': (41, 47),
 
-  'Creation of New Sale Packing Lists': (5, 10),
+  'Creation of New Sale Packing Lists': (27, 32),
 
-  'Expansion of Converged Changes': (8, 12),
+  'Expansion of Converged Changes': (48, 54),
 
-  'Expansion of Diverged Changes': (9, 13),
+  'Expansion of Diverged Changes': (53, 59),
 
-  'Adoption of Previsions': (20, 25),
+  'Adoption of Previsions': (105, 114),
 
-  'Acceptance of Decisions': (20, 25),
+  'Acceptance of Decisions': (104, 113),
 
   'Creation of New Applied Rules from Partially Simulated Deliveries':
-    (12, 17),
+    (38, 44),
 
-  'Creation Of New Sale Invoices': (9, 14),
+  'Creation Of New Sale Invoices': (48, 54),
 
-  'Addition of New Invoices Lines': (32, 39),
+  'Addition of New Invoices Lines': (116, 125),
 }
 
 class TestSimulationPerformance(ERP5TypeTestCase, LogInterceptor):

product/ERP5Type/tests/testPerformance.py

@@ -44,22 +44,24 @@ import os
 # specific testing environment. We must always try to stay below max
 # historical values.
                                     # Historical values
-MIN_OBJECT_VIEW=0.020               # 0.112
-MAX_OBJECT_VIEW=0.050               # 0.120
-MIN_OBJECT_MANY_LINES_VIEW=0.040    # 0.274
-MAX_OBJECT_MANY_LINES_VIEW=0.090    # 0.294
-MIN_OBJECT_PROXYFIELD_VIEW=0.020    # 0.199
-MAX_OBJECT_PROXYFIELD_VIEW=0.090    # 0.220
+MIN_OBJECT_VIEW=0.160               # 0.020, 0.112
+MAX_OBJECT_VIEW=0.174               # 0.050, 0.120
+MIN_OBJECT_MANY_LINES_VIEW=0.040    # 0.040, 0.274
+MAX_OBJECT_MANY_LINES_VIEW=0.090    # 0.090, 0.294
+MIN_OBJECT_PROXYFIELD_VIEW=0.242    # 0.020, 0.199
+MAX_OBJECT_PROXYFIELD_VIEW=0.257    # 0.090, 0.220
 #CURRENT_MIN_OBJECT_VIEW=0.1220
 #CURRENT_MAX_OBJECT_VIEW=0.1280
-MIN_MODULE_VIEW=0.020               # 0.125
-MAX_MODULE_VIEW=0.070               # 0.175
-MIN_TIC=0.0020                      # 0.260
-MAX_TIC=0.0090                      # 0.343
-MIN_OBJECT_CREATION=0.0010          # 0.0070
-MAX_OBJECT_CREATION=0.0040          # 0.0082
+MIN_MODULE_VIEW=0.160               # 0.020, 0.125
+MAX_MODULE_VIEW=0.174               # 0.070, 0.175
+MIN_TIC=0.0333                      # 0.0020, 0.260
+MAX_TIC=0.0354                      # 0.0090, 0.343
+MIN_OBJECT_CREATION=0.0130          # 0.0010, 0.0070
+MAX_OBJECT_CREATION=0.0145          # 0.0040, 0.0082
 LISTBOX_COEF=0.00173                # 0.02472
 # Change history
+# 2016-08-11
+#   Adapt values with new hardware from online.net.
 # 2013-03-01
 #   Adapt values with new hardware and last improvements
 # 2010-02-09

[Rafael Monnerat]

The hardware change was from an I7 CPU (8 cores) to an Atom one (8 Cores) which is much much slower. Use slower hardware is better for Performance tests as it can make improvements more visible.

Test results will be produced/launched for the past revisions in order to detect eventual performance decreasements introduced overtime.

[Julien Muchembled]

You didn't update the pystone line.