The TASKS03 and TREE04 rcutorture scenarios produce the following
lockdep complaint:

------------------------------------------------------------------------

================================
WARNING: inconsistent lock state
5.2.0-rc1+ #513 Not tainted
--------------------------------
inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
migration/1/14 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
(____ptrval____) (tick_broadcast_lock){?...}, at: tick_broadcast_offline+0xf/0x70
{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
  lock_acquire+0xb0/0x1c0
  _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3c/0x50
  tick_broadcast_switch_to_oneshot+0xd/0x40
  tick_switch_to_oneshot+0x4f/0xd0
  hrtimer_run_queues+0xf3/0x130
  run_local_timers+0x1c/0x50
  update_process_times+0x1c/0x50
  tick_periodic+0x26/0xc0
  tick_handle_periodic+0x1a/0x60
  smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x80/0x2a0
  apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20
  _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4e/0x60
  rcu_nocb_gp_kthread+0x15d/0x590
  kthread+0xf3/0x130
  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
irq event stamp: 171
hardirqs last  enabled at (171): [<ffffffff8a201a37>] trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
hardirqs last disabled at (170): [<ffffffff8a201a53>] trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<ffffffff8a264ee0>] copy_process.part.56+0x650/0x1cb0
softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(tick_broadcast_lock);
  <Interrupt>
    lock(tick_broadcast_lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by migration/1/14:
 #0: (____ptrval____) (clockevents_lock){+.+.}, at: tick_offline_cpu+0xf/0x30

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 14 Comm: migration/1 Not tainted 5.2.0-rc1+ #513
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x5e/0x8b
 print_usage_bug+0x1fc/0x216
 ? print_shortest_lock_dependencies+0x1b0/0x1b0
 mark_lock+0x1f2/0x280
 __lock_acquire+0x1e0/0x18f0
 ? __lock_acquire+0x21b/0x18f0
 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4e/0x60
 lock_acquire+0xb0/0x1c0
 ? tick_broadcast_offline+0xf/0x70
 _raw_spin_lock+0x33/0x40
 ? tick_broadcast_offline+0xf/0x70
 tick_broadcast_offline+0xf/0x70
 tick_offline_cpu+0x16/0x30
 take_cpu_down+0x7d/0xa0
 multi_cpu_stop+0xa2/0xe0
 ? cpu_stop_queue_work+0xc0/0xc0
 cpu_stopper_thread+0x6d/0x100
 smpboot_thread_fn+0x169/0x240
 kthread+0xf3/0x130
 ? sort_range+0x20/0x20
 ? kthread_cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x10/0x10
 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

------------------------------------------------------------------------

To reproduce, run the following rcutorture test:

        tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh --duration 5 --kconfig "CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y" --configs "TASKS03 TREE04"

It turns out that tick_broadcast_offline() was an innocent bystander.
After all, interrupts are supposed to be disabled throughout
take_cpu_down(), and therefore should have been disabled upon entry to
tick_offline_cpu() and thus to tick_broadcast_offline().  This suggests
that one of the CPU-hotplug notifiers was incorrectly enabling interrupts,
and leaving them enabled on return.

Some debugging code showed that the culprit was sched_cpu_dying().
It had irqs enabled after return from sched_tick_stop().  Which in turn
had irqs enabled after return from cancel_delayed_work_sync().  Which is a
wrapper around __cancel_work_timer().  Which can sleep in the case where
something else is concurrently trying to cancel the same delayed work,
and as Thomas Gleixner pointed out on IRC, sleeping is a decidedly bad
idea when you are invoked from take_cpu_down(), regardless of the state
you leave interrupts in upon return.

Code inspection located no reason why the delayed work absolutely
needed to be canceled from sched_tick_stop():  The work is not
bound to the outgoing CPU by design, given that the whole point is
to collect statistics without disturbing the outgoing CPU.

This commit therefore simply drops the cancel_delayed_work_sync() from
sched_tick_stop().  Instead, a new ->state field is added to the tick_work
structure so that the delayed-work handler function sched_tick_remote()
can avoid reposting itself.  A cpu_is_offline() check is also added to
sched_tick_remote() to avoid mucking with the state of an offlined CPU
(though it does appear safe to do so).  The sched_tick_start() and
sched_tick_stop() functions also update ->state, and sched_tick_start()
also schedules the delayed work if ->state indicates that it is not
already in flight.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
[ paulmck: Apply Peter Zijlstra and Frederic Weisbecker atomics feedback. ]
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>