-
Ingo Molnar authored
This is another generic fallout from the voluntary-preempt patchset: a cleanup of the cond_resched() infrastructure, in preparation of the latency reduction patches. The changes: - uninline cond_resched() - this makes the footprint smaller, especially once the number of cond_resched() points increase. - add a 'was rescheduled' return value to cond_resched. This makes it symmetric to cond_resched_lock() and later latency reduction patches rely on the ability to tell whether there was any preemption. - make cond_resched() more robust by using the same mechanism as preempt_kernel(): by using PREEMPT_ACTIVE. This preserves the task's state - e.g. if the task is in TASK_ZOMBIE but gets preempted via cond_resched() just prior scheduling off then this approach preserves TASK_ZOMBIE. - the patch also adds need_lockbreak() which critical sections can use to detect lock-break requests. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
3365d167