-
Roland McGrath authored
There is a BUG_ON in ptrace_stop that hits if the thread is not ptraced. However, there is no synchronization between a thread deciding to do a ptrace stop and so going here, and its ptracer dying and so detaching from it and clearing its ->ptrace field. The RHEL3 2.4-based kernel has a backport of a slightly older version of the 2.6 signals code, which has a different but equivalent BUG_ON. This actually bit users in practice (when the debugger dies), but was exceedingly difficult to reproduce in contrived circumstances. We moved forward in RHEL3 just by removing the BUG_ON, and that fixed the real user problems even though I was never able to reproduce the scenario myself. So, to my knowledge this scenario has never actually been seen in practice under 2.6. But it's plain to see from the code that it is indeed possible. This patch removes that BUG_ON, but also goes further and tries to handle this case more gracefully than simply avoiding the crash. By removing the BUG_ON alone, it becomes possible for the real parent of a process to see spurious SIGCHLD notifications intended for the debugger that has just died, and have its child wind up stopped unexpectedly. This patch avoids that possibility by detecting the case when we are about to do the ptrace stop but our ptracer has gone away, and simply eliding that ptrace stop altogether as if we hadn't been ptraced when we hit the interesting event (signal or ptrace_notify call for syscall tracing or something like that). Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
66519f54