-
Steven Rostedt authored
The tracing of ia32 compat system calls has been a bit of a pain as they use different system call numbers than the 64bit equivalents. I wrote a simple 'lls' program that lists files. I compiled it as a i686 ELF binary and ran it under a x86_64 box. This is the result: echo 0 > /debug/tracing/tracing_on echo 1 > /debug/tracing/events/syscalls/enable echo 1 > /debug/tracing/tracing_on ; ./lls ; echo 0 > /debug/tracing/tracing_on grep lls /debug/tracing/trace [.. skipping calls before TS_COMPAT is set ...] lls-1127 [005] d... 936.409188: sys_recvfrom(fd: 0, ubuf: 4d560fc4, size: 0, flags: 8048034, addr: 8, addr_len: f7700420) lls-1127 [005] d... 936.409190: sys_recvfrom -> 0x8a77000 lls-1127 [005] d... 936.409211: sys_lgetxattr(pathname: 0, name: 1000, value: 3, size: 22) lls-1127 [005] d... 936.409215: sys_lgetxattr -> 0xf76ff000 lls-1127 [005] d... 936.409223: sys_dup2(oldfd: 4d55ae9b, newfd: 4) lls-1127 [005] d... 936.409228: sys_dup2 -> 0xfffffffffffffffe lls-1127 [005] d... 936.409236: sys_newfstat(fd: 4d55b085, statbuf: 80000) lls-1127 [005] d... 936.409242: sys_newfstat -> 0x3 lls-1127 [005] d... 936.409243: sys_removexattr(pathname: 3, name: ffcd0060) lls-1127 [005] d... 936.409244: sys_removexattr -> 0x0 lls-1127 [005] d... 936.409245: sys_lgetxattr(pathname: 0, name: 19614, value: 1, size: 2) lls-1127 [005] d... 936.409248: sys_lgetxattr -> 0xf76e5000 lls-1127 [005] d... 936.409248: sys_newlstat(filename: 3, statbuf: 19614) lls-1127 [005] d... 936.409249: sys_newlstat -> 0x0 lls-1127 [005] d... 936.409262: sys_newfstat(fd: f76fb588, statbuf: 80000) lls-1127 [005] d... 936.409279: sys_newfstat -> 0x3 lls-1127 [005] d... 936.409279: sys_close(fd: 3) lls-1127 [005] d... 936.421550: sys_close -> 0x200 lls-1127 [005] d... 936.421558: sys_removexattr(pathname: 3, name: ffcd00d0) lls-1127 [005] d... 936.421560: sys_removexattr -> 0x0 lls-1127 [005] d... 936.421569: sys_lgetxattr(pathname: 4d564000, name: 1b1abc, value: 5, size: 802) lls-1127 [005] d... 936.421574: sys_lgetxattr -> 0x4d564000 lls-1127 [005] d... 936.421575: sys_capget(header: 4d70f000, dataptr: 1000) lls-1127 [005] d... 936.421580: sys_capget -> 0x0 lls-1127 [005] d... 936.421580: sys_lgetxattr(pathname: 4d710000, name: 3000, value: 3, size: 812) lls-1127 [005] d... 936.421589: sys_lgetxattr -> 0x4d710000 lls-1127 [005] d... 936.426130: sys_lgetxattr(pathname: 4d713000, name: 2abc, value: 3, size: 32) lls-1127 [005] d... 936.426141: sys_lgetxattr -> 0x4d713000 lls-1127 [005] d... 936.426145: sys_newlstat(filename: 3, statbuf: f76ff3f0) lls-1127 [005] d... 936.426146: sys_newlstat -> 0x0 lls-1127 [005] d... 936.431748: sys_lgetxattr(pathname: 0, name: 1000, value: 3, size: 22) Obviously I'm not calling newfstat with a fd of 4d55b085. The calls are obviously incorrect, and confusing. Other efforts have been made to fix this: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/26/367 But the real solution is to rewrite the syscall internals and come up with a fixed solution. One that doesn't require all the kluge that the current solution has. Thus for now, instead of outputting incorrect data, simply ignore them. With this patch the changes now have: #> grep lls /debug/tracing/trace #> Compat system calls simply are not traced. If users need compat syscalls, then they should just use the raw syscall tracepoints. For an architecture to make their compat syscalls ignored, it must define ARCH_TRACE_IGNORE_COMPAT_SYSCALLS (done in asm/ftrace.h) and also define an arch_trace_is_compat_syscall() function that will return true if the current task should ignore tracing the syscall. I want to stress that this change does not affect actual syscalls in any way, shape or form. It is only used within the tracing system and doesn't interfere with the syscall logic at all. The changes are consolidated nicely into trace_syscalls.c and asm/ftrace.h. I had to make one small modification to asm/thread_info.h and that was to remove the include of asm/ftrace.h. As asm/ftrace.h required the current_thread_info() it was causing include hell. That include was added back in 2008 when the function graph tracer was added: commit caf4b323 "tracing, x86: add low level support for ftrace return tracing" It does not need to be included there. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1360703939.21867.99.camel@gandalf.local.homeAcked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
f431b634