bpf: Remove !func_info and !line_info check from test_btf and bpftool

kernel can provide the func_info and line_info even
it fails the btf_dump_raw_ok() test because they don't contain
kernel address.  This patch removes the corresponding '== 0'
test.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c

@@ -596,13 +596,6 @@ static int do_dump(int argc, char **argv)
 		goto err_free;
 	}
 
-	if (func_info && !info.func_info) {
-		/* kernel.kptr_restrict is set.  No func_info available. */
-		free(func_info);
-		func_info = NULL;
-		nr_finfo = 0;
-	}
-
 	if (linfo && info.nr_line_info != nr_linfo) {
 		p_err("incorrect nr_line_info %u vs. expected %u",
 		      info.nr_line_info, nr_linfo);

tools/lib/bpf/bpf_prog_linfo.c

@@ -107,11 +107,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_linfo *bpf_prog_linfo__new(const struct bpf_prog_info *info)
 
 	nr_linfo = info->nr_line_info;
 
-	/*
-	 * Test !info->line_info because the kernel may NULL
-	 * the ptr if kernel.kptr_restrict is set.
-	 */
-	if (!nr_linfo || !info->line_info)
+	if (!nr_linfo)
 		return NULL;
 
 	/*

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c

@@ -3948,12 +3948,6 @@ static int test_get_finfo(const struct prog_info_raw_test *test,
 		goto done;
 	}
 
-	if (CHECK(!info.func_info,
-		  "info.func_info == 0. kernel.kptr_restrict is set?")) {
-		err = -1;
-		goto done;
-	}
-
 	finfo = func_info;
 	for (i = 0; i < test->func_info_cnt; i++) {
 		if (CHECK(finfo->type_id != test->func_info[i][1],
@@ -4077,7 +4071,6 @@ static int test_get_linfo(const struct prog_info_raw_test *test,
 	 * Other fields are not the concern of this test.
 	 */
 	if (CHECK(err == -1 ||
-		  !info.line_info ||
 		  info.nr_line_info != cnt ||
 		  (jited_cnt && !info.jited_line_info) ||
 		  info.nr_jited_line_info != jited_cnt ||