Commit 1ec2405c authored by Suravee Suthikulpanit's avatar Suravee Suthikulpanit Committed by Paolo Bonzini

kvm: ioapic: Refactor kvm_ioapic_update_eoi()

Refactor code for handling IOAPIC EOI for subsequent patch.
There is no functional change.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSuravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
parent e2ed4078
......@@ -154,10 +154,16 @@ static void kvm_rtc_eoi_tracking_restore_all(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic)
__rtc_irq_eoi_tracking_restore_one(vcpu);
}
static void rtc_irq_eoi(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static void rtc_irq_eoi(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
int vector)
{
if (test_and_clear_bit(vcpu->vcpu_id,
ioapic->rtc_status.dest_map.map)) {
struct dest_map *dest_map = &ioapic->rtc_status.dest_map;
/* RTC special handling */
if (test_bit(vcpu->vcpu_id, dest_map->map) &&
(vector == dest_map->vectors[vcpu->vcpu_id]) &&
(test_and_clear_bit(vcpu->vcpu_id,
ioapic->rtc_status.dest_map.map))) {
--ioapic->rtc_status.pending_eoi;
rtc_status_pending_eoi_check_valid(ioapic);
}
......@@ -454,24 +460,13 @@ static void kvm_ioapic_eoi_inject_work(struct work_struct *work)
}
#define IOAPIC_SUCCESSIVE_IRQ_MAX_COUNT 10000
static void __kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, int vector, int trigger_mode)
static void kvm_ioapic_update_eoi_one(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic,
int trigger_mode,
int pin)
{
struct dest_map *dest_map = &ioapic->rtc_status.dest_map;
struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
int i;
/* RTC special handling */
if (test_bit(vcpu->vcpu_id, dest_map->map) &&
vector == dest_map->vectors[vcpu->vcpu_id])
rtc_irq_eoi(ioapic, vcpu);
for (i = 0; i < IOAPIC_NUM_PINS; i++) {
union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry *ent = &ioapic->redirtbl[i];
if (ent->fields.vector != vector)
continue;
union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry *ent = &ioapic->redirtbl[pin];
/*
* We are dropping lock while calling ack notifiers because ack
......@@ -482,18 +477,18 @@ static void __kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
* after ack notifier returns.
*/
spin_unlock(&ioapic->lock);
kvm_notify_acked_irq(ioapic->kvm, KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC, i);
kvm_notify_acked_irq(ioapic->kvm, KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC, pin);
spin_lock(&ioapic->lock);
if (trigger_mode != IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG ||
kvm_lapic_get_reg(apic, APIC_SPIV) & APIC_SPIV_DIRECTED_EOI)
continue;
return;
ASSERT(ent->fields.trig_mode == IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG);
ent->fields.remote_irr = 0;
if (!ent->fields.mask && (ioapic->irr & (1 << i))) {
++ioapic->irq_eoi[i];
if (ioapic->irq_eoi[i] == IOAPIC_SUCCESSIVE_IRQ_MAX_COUNT) {
if (!ent->fields.mask && (ioapic->irr & (1 << pin))) {
++ioapic->irq_eoi[pin];
if (ioapic->irq_eoi[pin] == IOAPIC_SUCCESSIVE_IRQ_MAX_COUNT) {
/*
* Real hardware does not deliver the interrupt
* immediately during eoi broadcast, and this
......@@ -503,23 +498,30 @@ static void __kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
* behavior if we detect an interrupt storm.
*/
schedule_delayed_work(&ioapic->eoi_inject, HZ / 100);
ioapic->irq_eoi[i] = 0;
ioapic->irq_eoi[pin] = 0;
trace_kvm_ioapic_delayed_eoi_inj(ent->bits);
} else {
ioapic_service(ioapic, i, false);
ioapic_service(ioapic, pin, false);
}
} else {
ioapic->irq_eoi[i] = 0;
}
ioapic->irq_eoi[pin] = 0;
}
}
void kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector, int trigger_mode)
{
int i;
struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic = vcpu->kvm->arch.vioapic;
spin_lock(&ioapic->lock);
__kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(vcpu, ioapic, vector, trigger_mode);
rtc_irq_eoi(ioapic, vcpu, vector);
for (i = 0; i < IOAPIC_NUM_PINS; i++) {
union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry *ent = &ioapic->redirtbl[i];
if (ent->fields.vector != vector)
continue;
kvm_ioapic_update_eoi_one(vcpu, ioapic, trigger_mode, i);
}
spin_unlock(&ioapic->lock);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment