From 5204e51d30ceb9715e3d690efe84c50e2e9d557d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 16:10:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mfd: Correct copy and paste mistake in stmpe

When specifying IRQ numbers for the stmpe1601, IRQ defines for the
stmpe24xx were used instead. Fortunately, the defined numbers are
the same, hence why it survived testing. This fix is merely an
aesthetic one.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/mfd/stmpe.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/stmpe.c b/drivers/mfd/stmpe.c
index 5c8d8f260df2..e50ebdfeed0f 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/stmpe.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/stmpe.c
@@ -519,12 +519,12 @@ static const u8 stmpe1601_regs[] = {
 static struct stmpe_variant_block stmpe1601_blocks[] = {
 	{
 		.cell	= &stmpe_gpio_cell,
-		.irq	= STMPE24XX_IRQ_GPIOC,
+		.irq	= STMPE1601_IRQ_GPIOC,
 		.block	= STMPE_BLOCK_GPIO,
 	},
 	{
 		.cell	= &stmpe_keypad_cell,
-		.irq	= STMPE24XX_IRQ_KEYPAD,
+		.irq	= STMPE1601_IRQ_KEYPAD,
 		.block	= STMPE_BLOCK_KEYPAD,
 	},
 };
-- 
2.30.9