Commit 62dd86ac authored by Josh Poimboeuf's avatar Josh Poimboeuf Committed by Ingo Molnar

x86/unwind: Fix dereference of untrusted pointer

Tetsuo Handa and Fengguang Wu reported a panic in the unwinder:

  BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000001f2
  IP: update_stack_state+0xd4/0x340
  *pde = 00000000

  Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
  CPU: 0 PID: 18728 Comm: 01-cpu-hotplug Not tainted 4.13.0-rc4-00170-gb09be676 #592
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.9.3-20161025_171302-gandalf 04/01/2014
  task: bb0b53c0 task.stack: bb3ac000
  EIP: update_stack_state+0xd4/0x340
  EFLAGS: 00010002 CPU: 0
  EAX: 0000a570 EBX: bb3adccb ECX: 0000f401 EDX: 0000a570
  ESI: 00000001 EDI: 000001ba EBP: bb3adc6b ESP: bb3adc3f
   DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068
  CR0: 80050033 CR2: 000001f2 CR3: 0b3a7000 CR4: 00140690
  DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
  DR6: fffe0ff0 DR7: 00000400
  Call Trace:
   ? unwind_next_frame+0xea/0x400
   ? __unwind_start+0xf5/0x180
   ? __save_stack_trace+0x81/0x160
   ? save_stack_trace+0x20/0x30
   ? __lock_acquire+0xfa5/0x12f0
   ? lock_acquire+0x1c2/0x230
   ? tick_periodic+0x3a/0xf0
   ? _raw_spin_lock+0x42/0x50
   ? tick_periodic+0x3a/0xf0
   ? tick_periodic+0x3a/0xf0
   ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x12/0x20
   ? tick_handle_periodic+0x23/0xc0
   ? local_apic_timer_interrupt+0x63/0x70
   ? smp_trace_apic_timer_interrupt+0x235/0x6a0
   ? trace_apic_timer_interrupt+0x37/0x3c
   ? strrchr+0x23/0x50
  Code: 0f 95 c1 89 c7 89 45 e4 0f b6 c1 89 c6 89 45 dc 8b 04 85 98 cb 74 bc 88 4d e3 89 45 f0 83 c0 01 84 c9 89 04 b5 98 cb 74 bc 74 3b <8b> 47 38 8b 57 34 c6 43 1d 01 25 00 00 02 00 83 e2 03 09 d0 83
  EIP: update_stack_state+0xd4/0x340 SS:ESP: 0068:bb3adc3f
  CR2: 00000000000001f2
  ---[ end trace 0d147fd4aba8ff50 ]---
  Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt

On x86-32, after decoding a frame pointer to get a regs address,
regs_size() dereferences the regs pointer when it checks regs->cs to see
if the regs are user mode.  This is dangerous because it's possible that
what looks like a decoded frame pointer is actually a corrupt value, and
we don't want the unwinder to make things worse.

Instead of calling regs_size() on an unsafe pointer, just assume they're
kernel regs to start with.  Later, once it's safe to access the regs, we
can do the user mode check and corresponding safety check for the
remaining two regs.
Reported-and-tested-by: default avatarTetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Reported-and-tested-by: default avatarFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: LKP <lkp@01.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 5ed8d8bb ("x86/unwind: Move common code into update_stack_state()")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/7f95b9a6993dec7674b3f3ab3dcd3294f7b9644d.1507597785.git.jpoimboe@redhat.comSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 6b32c126
...@@ -184,6 +184,12 @@ static struct pt_regs *decode_frame_pointer(unsigned long *bp) ...@@ -184,6 +184,12 @@ static struct pt_regs *decode_frame_pointer(unsigned long *bp)
return (struct pt_regs *)(regs & ~0x1); return (struct pt_regs *)(regs & ~0x1);
} }
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
#define KERNEL_REGS_SIZE (sizeof(struct pt_regs) - 2*sizeof(long))
#else
#define KERNEL_REGS_SIZE (sizeof(struct pt_regs))
#endif
static bool update_stack_state(struct unwind_state *state, static bool update_stack_state(struct unwind_state *state,
unsigned long *next_bp) unsigned long *next_bp)
{ {
...@@ -202,7 +208,7 @@ static bool update_stack_state(struct unwind_state *state, ...@@ -202,7 +208,7 @@ static bool update_stack_state(struct unwind_state *state,
regs = decode_frame_pointer(next_bp); regs = decode_frame_pointer(next_bp);
if (regs) { if (regs) {
frame = (unsigned long *)regs; frame = (unsigned long *)regs;
len = regs_size(regs); len = KERNEL_REGS_SIZE;
state->got_irq = true; state->got_irq = true;
} else { } else {
frame = next_bp; frame = next_bp;
...@@ -226,6 +232,14 @@ static bool update_stack_state(struct unwind_state *state, ...@@ -226,6 +232,14 @@ static bool update_stack_state(struct unwind_state *state,
frame < prev_frame_end) frame < prev_frame_end)
return false; return false;
/*
* On 32-bit with user mode regs, make sure the last two regs are safe
* to access:
*/
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32) && regs && user_mode(regs) &&
!on_stack(info, frame, len + 2*sizeof(long)))
return false;
/* Move state to the next frame: */ /* Move state to the next frame: */
if (regs) { if (regs) {
state->regs = regs; state->regs = regs;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment