Commit 83c42212 authored by Wolfram Sang's avatar Wolfram Sang Committed by Wolfram Sang

i2c: core: use I2C locking behaviour also for SMBUS

If I2C transfers are executed in atomic contexts, trylock is used
instead of lock. This behaviour was missing for SMBUS, although a lot of
transfers are of SMBUS type, either emulated or direct. So, factor out
the locking routine into a helper and use it for I2C and SMBUS.
Signed-off-by: default avatarWolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Reviewed-by Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
parent bae1d3a0
...@@ -1946,14 +1946,9 @@ int i2c_transfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num) ...@@ -1946,14 +1946,9 @@ int i2c_transfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
* one (discarding status on the second message) or errno * one (discarding status on the second message) or errno
* (discarding status on the first one). * (discarding status on the first one).
*/ */
if (i2c_in_atomic_xfer_mode()) { ret = __i2c_lock_bus_helper(adap);
ret = i2c_trylock_bus(adap, I2C_LOCK_SEGMENT); if (ret)
if (!ret) return ret;
/* I2C activity is ongoing. */
return -EAGAIN;
} else {
i2c_lock_bus(adap, I2C_LOCK_SEGMENT);
}
ret = __i2c_transfer(adap, msgs, num); ret = __i2c_transfer(adap, msgs, num);
i2c_unlock_bus(adap, I2C_LOCK_SEGMENT); i2c_unlock_bus(adap, I2C_LOCK_SEGMENT);
......
...@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ ...@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
#include <linux/i2c-smbus.h> #include <linux/i2c-smbus.h>
#include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/slab.h>
#include "i2c-core.h"
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include <trace/events/smbus.h> #include <trace/events/smbus.h>
...@@ -530,7 +532,10 @@ s32 i2c_smbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, u16 addr, ...@@ -530,7 +532,10 @@ s32 i2c_smbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, u16 addr,
{ {
s32 res; s32 res;
i2c_lock_bus(adapter, I2C_LOCK_SEGMENT); res = __i2c_lock_bus_helper(adapter);
if (res)
return res;
res = __i2c_smbus_xfer(adapter, addr, flags, read_write, res = __i2c_smbus_xfer(adapter, addr, flags, read_write,
command, protocol, data); command, protocol, data);
i2c_unlock_bus(adapter, I2C_LOCK_SEGMENT); i2c_unlock_bus(adapter, I2C_LOCK_SEGMENT);
......
...@@ -39,6 +39,18 @@ static inline bool i2c_in_atomic_xfer_mode(void) ...@@ -39,6 +39,18 @@ static inline bool i2c_in_atomic_xfer_mode(void)
return system_state > SYSTEM_RUNNING && irqs_disabled(); return system_state > SYSTEM_RUNNING && irqs_disabled();
} }
static inline int __i2c_lock_bus_helper(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
{
int ret = 0;
if (i2c_in_atomic_xfer_mode())
ret = i2c_trylock_bus(adap, I2C_LOCK_SEGMENT) ? 0 : -EAGAIN;
else
i2c_lock_bus(adap, I2C_LOCK_SEGMENT);
return ret;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
const struct acpi_device_id * const struct acpi_device_id *
i2c_acpi_match_device(const struct acpi_device_id *matches, i2c_acpi_match_device(const struct acpi_device_id *matches,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment