Commit 8d7d7a93 authored by Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar Gustavo A. R. Silva Committed by Kalle Valo

prism54: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200507190210.GA15375@embeddedor
parent 17481234
...@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ struct obj_mlmeex { ...@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ struct obj_mlmeex {
u16 state; u16 state;
u16 code; u16 code;
u16 size; u16 size;
u8 data[0]; u8 data[];
} __packed; } __packed;
struct obj_buffer { struct obj_buffer {
...@@ -68,12 +68,12 @@ struct obj_bss { ...@@ -68,12 +68,12 @@ struct obj_bss {
struct obj_bsslist { struct obj_bsslist {
u32 nr; u32 nr;
struct obj_bss bsslist[0]; struct obj_bss bsslist[];
} __packed; } __packed;
struct obj_frequencies { struct obj_frequencies {
u16 nr; u16 nr;
u16 mhz[0]; u16 mhz[];
} __packed; } __packed;
struct obj_attachment { struct obj_attachment {
...@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ struct obj_attachment { ...@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ struct obj_attachment {
char reserved; char reserved;
short id; short id;
short size; short size;
char data[0]; char data[];
} __packed; } __packed;
/* /*
......
...@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ struct islpci_mgmtframe { ...@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ struct islpci_mgmtframe {
pimfor_header_t *header; /* payload header, points into buf */ pimfor_header_t *header; /* payload header, points into buf */
void *data; /* payload ex header, points into buf */ void *data; /* payload ex header, points into buf */
struct work_struct ws; /* argument for schedule_work() */ struct work_struct ws; /* argument for schedule_work() */
char buf[0]; /* fragment buffer */ char buf[]; /* fragment buffer */
}; };
int int
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment