Commit 0e06d906 authored by Julien Muchembled's avatar Julien Muchembled

qa: rewrite test_answerStoreObject_3 as a threaded test

The removed test_answerStoreObject_{1,2} only covered the
'raise NEOStorageError', which is already an assertion.
parent 4a52bd98
...@@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ UNIT_TEST_MODULES = [ ...@@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ UNIT_TEST_MODULES = [
# client application # client application
'neo.tests.client.testClientApp', 'neo.tests.client.testClientApp',
'neo.tests.client.testMasterHandler', 'neo.tests.client.testMasterHandler',
'neo.tests.client.testStorageHandler',
'neo.tests.client.testConnectionPool', 'neo.tests.client.testConnectionPool',
# light functional tests # light functional tests
'neo.tests.threaded.test', 'neo.tests.threaded.test',
......
#
# Copyright (C) 2009-2016 Nexedi SA
#
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
# as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
# of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
import unittest
from mock import Mock
from .. import NeoUnitTestBase
from neo.client.handlers.storage import StorageAnswersHandler
from neo.client.exception import NEOStorageError, NEOStorageNotFoundError
class StorageAnswerHandlerTests(NeoUnitTestBase):
def setUp(self):
super(StorageAnswerHandlerTests, self).setUp()
self.app = Mock()
self.handler = StorageAnswersHandler(self.app)
def _getAnswerStoreObjectHandler(self, object_stored_counter_dict,
conflict_serial_dict, resolved_conflict_serial_dict):
app = Mock({
'getHandlerData': {
'object_stored_counter_dict': object_stored_counter_dict,
'conflict_serial_dict': conflict_serial_dict,
'resolved_conflict_serial_dict': resolved_conflict_serial_dict,
}
})
return StorageAnswersHandler(app)
def test_answerStoreObject_1(self):
conn = self.getFakeConnection()
oid = self.getOID(0)
tid = self.getNextTID()
# conflict
object_stored_counter_dict = {oid: {}}
conflict_serial_dict = {}
resolved_conflict_serial_dict = {}
self._getAnswerStoreObjectHandler(object_stored_counter_dict,
conflict_serial_dict, resolved_conflict_serial_dict,
).answerStoreObject(conn, 1, oid, tid)
self.assertEqual(conflict_serial_dict[oid], {tid})
self.assertEqual(object_stored_counter_dict[oid], {})
self.assertFalse(oid in resolved_conflict_serial_dict)
# object was already accepted by another storage, raise
handler = self._getAnswerStoreObjectHandler({oid: {tid: {1}}}, {}, {})
self.assertRaises(NEOStorageError, handler.answerStoreObject,
conn, 1, oid, tid)
def test_answerStoreObject_2(self):
conn = self.getFakeConnection()
oid = self.getOID(0)
tid = self.getNextTID()
tid_2 = self.getNextTID()
# resolution-pending conflict
object_stored_counter_dict = {oid: {}}
conflict_serial_dict = {oid: {tid}}
resolved_conflict_serial_dict = {}
self._getAnswerStoreObjectHandler(object_stored_counter_dict,
conflict_serial_dict, resolved_conflict_serial_dict,
).answerStoreObject(conn, 1, oid, tid)
self.assertEqual(conflict_serial_dict[oid], {tid})
self.assertFalse(oid in resolved_conflict_serial_dict)
self.assertEqual(object_stored_counter_dict[oid], {})
# object was already accepted by another storage, raise
handler = self._getAnswerStoreObjectHandler({oid: {tid: {1}}},
{oid: {tid}}, {})
self.assertRaises(NEOStorageError, handler.answerStoreObject,
conn, 1, oid, tid)
# detected conflict is different, don't raise
self._getAnswerStoreObjectHandler({oid: {}}, {oid: {tid}}, {},
).answerStoreObject(conn, 1, oid, tid_2)
def test_answerStoreObject_3(self):
conn = self.getFakeConnection()
oid = self.getOID(0)
tid = self.getNextTID()
tid_2 = self.getNextTID()
# already-resolved conflict
# This case happens if a storage is answering a store action for which
# any other storage already answered (with same conflict) and any other
# storage accepted the resolved object.
object_stored_counter_dict = {oid: {tid_2: 1}}
conflict_serial_dict = {}
resolved_conflict_serial_dict = {oid: {tid}}
self._getAnswerStoreObjectHandler(object_stored_counter_dict,
conflict_serial_dict, resolved_conflict_serial_dict,
).answerStoreObject(conn, 1, oid, tid)
self.assertFalse(oid in conflict_serial_dict)
self.assertEqual(resolved_conflict_serial_dict[oid], {tid})
self.assertEqual(object_stored_counter_dict[oid], {tid_2: 1})
# detected conflict is different, don't raise
self._getAnswerStoreObjectHandler({oid: {tid: 1}}, {},
{oid: {tid}}).answerStoreObject(conn, 1, oid, tid_2)
def test_tidNotFound(self):
conn = self.getFakeConnection()
self.assertRaises(NEOStorageNotFoundError, self.handler.tidNotFound,
conn, 'message')
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()
...@@ -1459,5 +1459,38 @@ class Test(NEOThreadedTest): ...@@ -1459,5 +1459,38 @@ class Test(NEOThreadedTest):
finally: finally:
cluster.stop() cluster.stop()
def testLateConflictOnReplica(self):
"""
Already resolved conflict: check the case of a storage node that
reports a conflict after that this conflict was fully resolved with
another node.
"""
def answerStoreObject(orig, conn, conflicting, *args):
if not conflicting:
p.revert()
ll()
orig(conn, conflicting, *args)
cluster = NEOCluster(replicas=1)
try:
cluster.start()
s0, s1 = cluster.storage_list
t1, c1 = cluster.getTransaction()
c1.root()['x'] = x = PCounterWithResolution()
t1.commit()
x.value += 1
t2, c2 = cluster.getTransaction()
c2.root()['x'].value += 2
t2.commit()
with LockLock() as ll, s1.filterConnection(cluster.client) as f, \
Patch(cluster.client.storage_handler,
answerStoreObject=answerStoreObject) as p:
f.add(lambda conn, packet:
isinstance(packet, Packets.AnswerStoreObject))
t = self.newThread(t1.commit)
ll()
t.join()
finally:
cluster.stop()
if __name__ == "__main__": if __name__ == "__main__":
unittest.main() unittest.main()
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment