From 744d3bcf18bfd22f1f21ee51e4043d5d80fee2c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?=C5=81ukasz=20Nowak?= <luke@nexedi.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 15:30:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Avoid calling checkConsistency constraint providers.

They use the same method name to do another task: check consistency on passed
object. Thus it is impossible to check consistency on them.
---
 .../erp5_administration/Base_checkAlarmConsistency.xml      | 6 ++++++
 bt5/erp5_administration/bt/revision                         | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/bt5/erp5_administration/SkinTemplateItem/portal_skins/erp5_administration/Base_checkAlarmConsistency.xml b/bt5/erp5_administration/SkinTemplateItem/portal_skins/erp5_administration/Base_checkAlarmConsistency.xml
index 1793490bc6..32c46d85e9 100644
--- a/bt5/erp5_administration/SkinTemplateItem/portal_skins/erp5_administration/Base_checkAlarmConsistency.xml
+++ b/bt5/erp5_administration/SkinTemplateItem/portal_skins/erp5_administration/Base_checkAlarmConsistency.xml
@@ -54,6 +54,12 @@
 from Products.CMFActivity.ActiveResult import ActiveResult\n
 \n
 constraint_message_list = []\n
+\n
+if context.providesIConstraint():\n
+  # it is not possible to checkConsistency of Constraint itself, as method\n
+  # of this name implement consistency checking on object\n
+  return constraint_message_list\n
+\n
 traverse = context.getPortalObject().restrictedTraverse\n
 property_type_validity = PropertyTypeValidity(id=\'type_check\', description=\'Type Validity Check\')\n
 \n
diff --git a/bt5/erp5_administration/bt/revision b/bt5/erp5_administration/bt/revision
index eafdfb06c5..b5db9c417a 100644
--- a/bt5/erp5_administration/bt/revision
+++ b/bt5/erp5_administration/bt/revision
@@ -1 +1 @@
-138
\ No newline at end of file
+139
\ No newline at end of file
-- 
2.30.9