Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
C
cython
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
Analytics
Analytics
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Boxiang Sun
cython
Commits
0d334ef0
Commit
0d334ef0
authored
Jun 16, 2018
by
gabrieldemarmiesse
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
Moved an examples from profiling_tutorial.rst to the examples directory.
parent
3d291a58
Changes
2
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
with
15 additions
and
14 deletions
+15
-14
docs/examples/tutorial/profiling_tutorial/calc_pi_3.pyx
docs/examples/tutorial/profiling_tutorial/calc_pi_3.pyx
+13
-0
docs/src/tutorial/profiling_tutorial.rst
docs/src/tutorial/profiling_tutorial.rst
+2
-14
No files found.
docs/examples/tutorial/profiling_tutorial/calc_pi_3.pyx
0 → 100644
View file @
0d334ef0
# cython: profile=True
# calc_pi.pyx
cdef
inline
double
recip_square
(
int
i
):
return
1.
/
(
i
*
i
)
def
approx_pi
(
int
n
=
10000000
):
cdef
double
val
=
0.
cdef
int
k
for
k
in
range
(
1
,
n
+
1
):
val
+=
recip_square
(
k
)
return
(
6
*
val
)
**
.
5
docs/src/tutorial/profiling_tutorial.rst
View file @
0d334ef0
...
@@ -239,21 +239,9 @@ so it would be wise to turn it into a cdef to reduce call overhead. We should
...
@@ -239,21 +239,9 @@ so it would be wise to turn it into a cdef to reduce call overhead. We should
also get rid of the power operator: it is turned into a pow(i,2) function call by
also get rid of the power operator: it is turned into a pow(i,2) function call by
Cython, but we could instead just write i*i which could be faster. The
Cython, but we could instead just write i*i which could be faster. The
whole function is also a good candidate for inlining. Let's look at the
whole function is also a good candidate for inlining. Let's look at the
necessary changes for these ideas:
:
necessary changes for these ideas:
# encoding: utf-8
.. literalinclude:: ../../examples/tutorial/profiling_tutorial/calc_pi_3.pyx
# cython: profile=True
# filename: calc_pi.pyx
cdef inline double recip_square(int i):
return 1./(i*i)
def approx_pi(int n=10000000):
cdef double val = 0.
cdef int k
for k in xrange(1,n+1):
val += recip_square(k)
return (6 * val)**.5
Now running the profile script yields:
Now running the profile script yields:
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment