Commit 4895af4e authored by Benjamin Peterson's avatar Benjamin Peterson

fix the ignoring of __cmp__ method on metaclasses #7491

parent 2a08b42e
...@@ -1222,6 +1222,15 @@ order (MRO) for bases """ ...@@ -1222,6 +1222,15 @@ order (MRO) for bases """
# This used to crash # This used to crash
self.assertRaises(TypeError, MyABC.a.__set__, u, 3) self.assertRaises(TypeError, MyABC.a.__set__, u, 3)
def test_metaclass_cmp(self):
# See bug 7491.
class M(type):
def __cmp__(self, other):
return -1
class X(object):
__metaclass__ = M
self.assertTrue(X < M)
def test_dynamics(self): def test_dynamics(self):
# Testing class attribute propagation... # Testing class attribute propagation...
class D(object): class D(object):
......
...@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ What's New in Python 2.7 alpha 2? ...@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ What's New in Python 2.7 alpha 2?
Core and Builtins Core and Builtins
----------------- -----------------
- Issue #7491: Metaclass's __cmp__ method was ignored.
- Issue #7466: segmentation fault when the garbage collector is called - Issue #7466: segmentation fault when the garbage collector is called
in the middle of populating a tuple. Patch by Florent Xicluna. in the middle of populating a tuple. Patch by Florent Xicluna.
......
...@@ -628,7 +628,11 @@ type_richcompare(PyObject *v, PyObject *w, int op) ...@@ -628,7 +628,11 @@ type_richcompare(PyObject *v, PyObject *w, int op)
int c; int c;
/* Make sure both arguments are types. */ /* Make sure both arguments are types. */
if (!PyType_Check(v) || !PyType_Check(w)) { if (!PyType_Check(v) || !PyType_Check(w) ||
/* If there is a __cmp__ method defined, let it be called instead
of our dumb function designed merely to warn. See bug
#7491. */
Py_TYPE(v)->tp_compare || Py_TYPE(w)->tp_compare) {
result = Py_NotImplemented; result = Py_NotImplemented;
goto out; goto out;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment