Commit 6165d55f authored by INADA Naoki's avatar INADA Naoki

Issue #28147: Fix a memory leak in split-table dictionaries

setattr() must not convert combined table into split table.
parent 270a21fd
...@@ -836,6 +836,24 @@ class DictTest(unittest.TestCase): ...@@ -836,6 +836,24 @@ class DictTest(unittest.TestCase):
pass pass
self._tracked(MyDict()) self._tracked(MyDict())
@support.cpython_only
def test_splittable_setattr_after_pop(self):
"""setattr must not convert combined table into split table"""
# Issue 28147
import _testcapi
class C:
pass
a = C()
a.a = 2
self.assertTrue(_testcapi.dict_hassplittable(a.__dict__))
# dict.popitem() convert it to combined table
a.__dict__.popitem()
self.assertFalse(_testcapi.dict_hassplittable(a.__dict__))
# But C should not convert a.__dict__ to split table again.
a.a = 3
self.assertFalse(_testcapi.dict_hassplittable(a.__dict__))
def test_iterator_pickling(self): def test_iterator_pickling(self):
for proto in range(pickle.HIGHEST_PROTOCOL + 1): for proto in range(pickle.HIGHEST_PROTOCOL + 1):
data = {1:"a", 2:"b", 3:"c"} data = {1:"a", 2:"b", 3:"c"}
......
...@@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ Release date: TBA ...@@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ Release date: TBA
Core and Builtins Core and Builtins
----------------- -----------------
- Issue #28147: Fix a memory leak in split-table dictionaries: setattr()
must not convert combined table into split table.
- Issue #25677: Correct the positioning of the syntax error caret for - Issue #25677: Correct the positioning of the syntax error caret for
indented blocks. Based on patch by Michael Layzell. indented blocks. Based on patch by Michael Layzell.
......
...@@ -249,6 +249,15 @@ test_dict_iteration(PyObject* self) ...@@ -249,6 +249,15 @@ test_dict_iteration(PyObject* self)
} }
static PyObject*
dict_hassplittable(PyObject *self, PyObject *arg)
{
if (!PyArg_Parse(arg, "O!:dict_hassplittable", &PyDict_Type, &arg)) {
return NULL;
}
return PyBool_FromLong(_PyDict_HasSplitTable((PyDictObject*)arg));
}
/* Issue #4701: Check that PyObject_Hash implicitly calls /* Issue #4701: Check that PyObject_Hash implicitly calls
* PyType_Ready if it hasn't already been called * PyType_Ready if it hasn't already been called
*/ */
...@@ -3858,6 +3867,7 @@ static PyMethodDef TestMethods[] = { ...@@ -3858,6 +3867,7 @@ static PyMethodDef TestMethods[] = {
{"test_datetime_capi", test_datetime_capi, METH_NOARGS}, {"test_datetime_capi", test_datetime_capi, METH_NOARGS},
{"test_list_api", (PyCFunction)test_list_api, METH_NOARGS}, {"test_list_api", (PyCFunction)test_list_api, METH_NOARGS},
{"test_dict_iteration", (PyCFunction)test_dict_iteration,METH_NOARGS}, {"test_dict_iteration", (PyCFunction)test_dict_iteration,METH_NOARGS},
{"dict_hassplittable", dict_hassplittable, METH_O},
{"test_lazy_hash_inheritance", (PyCFunction)test_lazy_hash_inheritance,METH_NOARGS}, {"test_lazy_hash_inheritance", (PyCFunction)test_lazy_hash_inheritance,METH_NOARGS},
{"test_long_api", (PyCFunction)test_long_api, METH_NOARGS}, {"test_long_api", (PyCFunction)test_long_api, METH_NOARGS},
{"test_xincref_doesnt_leak",(PyCFunction)test_xincref_doesnt_leak, METH_NOARGS}, {"test_xincref_doesnt_leak",(PyCFunction)test_xincref_doesnt_leak, METH_NOARGS},
......
...@@ -985,8 +985,10 @@ make_keys_shared(PyObject *op) ...@@ -985,8 +985,10 @@ make_keys_shared(PyObject *op)
return NULL; return NULL;
} }
else if (mp->ma_keys->dk_lookup == lookdict_unicode) { else if (mp->ma_keys->dk_lookup == lookdict_unicode) {
/* Remove dummy keys */ /* Remove dummy keys
if (dictresize(mp, DK_SIZE(mp->ma_keys))) * -1 is required since dictresize() uses key size > minused
*/
if (dictresize(mp, DK_SIZE(mp->ma_keys) - 1))
return NULL; return NULL;
} }
assert(mp->ma_keys->dk_lookup == lookdict_unicode_nodummy); assert(mp->ma_keys->dk_lookup == lookdict_unicode_nodummy);
...@@ -2473,7 +2475,8 @@ dict_popitem(PyDictObject *mp) ...@@ -2473,7 +2475,8 @@ dict_popitem(PyDictObject *mp)
} }
/* Convert split table to combined table */ /* Convert split table to combined table */
if (mp->ma_keys->dk_lookup == lookdict_split) { if (mp->ma_keys->dk_lookup == lookdict_split) {
if (dictresize(mp, DK_SIZE(mp->ma_keys))) { /* -1 is required since dictresize() uses key size > minused */
if (dictresize(mp, DK_SIZE(mp->ma_keys) - 1)) {
Py_DECREF(res); Py_DECREF(res);
return NULL; return NULL;
} }
...@@ -3848,10 +3851,16 @@ _PyObjectDict_SetItem(PyTypeObject *tp, PyObject **dictptr, ...@@ -3848,10 +3851,16 @@ _PyObjectDict_SetItem(PyTypeObject *tp, PyObject **dictptr,
CACHED_KEYS(tp) = NULL; CACHED_KEYS(tp) = NULL;
DK_DECREF(cached); DK_DECREF(cached);
} }
} else { }
else {
int was_shared = cached == ((PyDictObject *)dict)->ma_keys;
res = PyDict_SetItem(dict, key, value); res = PyDict_SetItem(dict, key, value);
if (cached != ((PyDictObject *)dict)->ma_keys) { /* PyDict_SetItem() may call dictresize() and convert split table
/* Either update tp->ht_cached_keys or delete it */ * into combined table. In such case, convert it to split
* table again and update type's shared key only when this is
* the only dict sharing key with the type.
*/
if (was_shared && cached != ((PyDictObject *)dict)->ma_keys) {
if (cached->dk_refcnt == 1) { if (cached->dk_refcnt == 1) {
CACHED_KEYS(tp) = make_keys_shared(dict); CACHED_KEYS(tp) = make_keys_shared(dict);
} else { } else {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment