Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
C
cpython
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
Analytics
Analytics
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Kirill Smelkov
cpython
Commits
996b46a0
Commit
996b46a0
authored
Sep 01, 2010
by
Raymond Hettinger
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
Forward port sorting howto
parent
293ffcf8
Changes
2
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
with
280 additions
and
0 deletions
+280
-0
Doc/howto/index.rst
Doc/howto/index.rst
+1
-0
Doc/howto/sorting.rst
Doc/howto/sorting.rst
+279
-0
No files found.
Doc/howto/index.rst
View file @
996b46a0
...
...
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ Currently, the HOWTOs are:
functional.rst
regex.rst
sockets.rst
sorting.rst
unicode.rst
urllib2.rst
webservers.rst
...
...
Doc/howto/sorting.rst
0 → 100644
View file @
996b46a0
Sorting HOW TO
**************
:Author: Andrew Dalke and Raymond Hettinger
:Release: 0.1
Python lists have a built-in :meth:`list.sort` method that modifies the list
in-place and a :func:`sorted` built-in function that builds a new sorted list
from an iterable.
In this document, we explore the various techniques for sorting data using Python.
Sorting Basics
==============
A simple ascending sort is very easy: just call the :func:`sorted` function. It
returns a new sorted list::
>>> sorted([5, 2, 3, 1, 4])
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
You can also use the :meth:`list.sort` method of a list. It modifies the list
in-place (and returns *None* to avoid confusion). Usually it's less convenient
than :func:`sorted` - but if you don't need the original list, it's slightly
more efficient.
>>> a = [5, 2, 3, 1, 4]
>>> a.sort()
>>> a
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Another difference is that the :meth:`list.sort` method is only defined for
lists. In contrast, the :func:`sorted` function accepts any iterable.
>>> sorted({1: 'D', 2: 'B', 3: 'B', 4: 'E', 5: 'A'})
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Key Functions
=============
Both :meth:`list.sort` and :func:`sorted` have *key* parameter to specify a
function to be called on each list element prior to making comparisons.
For example, here's a case-insensitive string comparison:
>>> sorted("This is a test string from Andrew".split(), key=str.lower)
['a', 'Andrew', 'from', 'is', 'string', 'test', 'This']
The value of the *key* parameter should be a function that takes a single argument
and returns a key to use for sorting purposes. This technique is fast because
the key function is called exactly once for each input record.
A common pattern is to sort complex objects using some of the object's indices
as keys. For example:
>>> student_tuples = [
('john', 'A', 15),
('jane', 'B', 12),
('dave', 'B', 10),
]
>>> sorted(student_tuples, key=lambda student: student[2]) # sort by age
[('dave', 'B', 10), ('jane', 'B', 12), ('john', 'A', 15)]
The same technique works for objects with named attributes. For example:
>>> class Student:
def __init__(self, name, grade, age):
self.name = name
self.grade = grade
self.age = age
def __repr__(self):
return repr((self.name, self.grade, self.age))
>>> student_objects = [
Student('john', 'A', 15),
Student('jane', 'B', 12),
Student('dave', 'B', 10),
]
>>> sorted(student_objects, key=lambda student: student.age) # sort by age
[('dave', 'B', 10), ('jane', 'B', 12), ('john', 'A', 15)]
Operator Module Functions
=========================
The key-function patterns shown above are very common, so Python provides
convenience functions to make accessor functions easier and faster. The operator
module has :func:`operator.itemgetter`, :func:`operator.attrgetter`, and
an :func:`operator.methodcaller` function.
Using those functions, the above examples become simpler and faster:
>>> from operator import itemgetter, attrgetter
>>> sorted(student_tuples, key=itemgetter(2))
[('dave', 'B', 10), ('jane', 'B', 12), ('john', 'A', 15)]
>>> sorted(student_objects, key=attrgetter('age'))
[('dave', 'B', 10), ('jane', 'B', 12), ('john', 'A', 15)]
The operator module functions allow multiple levels of sorting. For example, to
sort by *grade* then by *age*:
>>> sorted(student_tuples, key=itemgetter(1,2))
[('john', 'A', 15), ('dave', 'B', 10), ('jane', 'B', 12)]
>>> sorted(student_objects, key=attrgetter('grade', 'age'))
[('john', 'A', 15), ('dave', 'B', 10), ('jane', 'B', 12)]
Ascending and Descending
========================
Both :meth:`list.sort` and :func:`sorted` accept a *reverse* parameter with a
boolean value. This is using to flag descending sorts. For example, to get the
student data in reverse *age* order:
>>> sorted(student_tuples, key=itemgetter(2), reverse=True)
[('john', 'A', 15), ('jane', 'B', 12), ('dave', 'B', 10)]
>>> sorted(student_objects, key=attrgetter('age'), reverse=True)
[('john', 'A', 15), ('jane', 'B', 12), ('dave', 'B', 10)]
Sort Stability and Complex Sorts
================================
Sorts are guaranteed to be `stable
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sorting_algorithm#Stability>`_\. That means that
when multiple records have the same key, their original order is preserved.
>>> data = [('red', 1), ('blue', 1), ('red', 2), ('blue', 2)]
>>> sorted(data, key=itemgetter(0))
[('blue', 1), ('blue', 2), ('red', 1), ('red', 2)]
Notice how the two records for *blue* retain their original order so that
``('blue', 1)`` is guaranteed to precede ``('blue', 2)``.
This wonderful property lets you build complex sorts in a series of sorting
steps. For example, to sort the student data by descending *grade* and then
ascending *age*, do the *age* sort first and then sort again using *grade*:
>>> s = sorted(student_objects, key=attrgetter('age')) # sort on secondary key
>>> sorted(s, key=attrgetter('grade'), reverse=True) # now sort on primary key, descending
[('dave', 'B', 10), ('jane', 'B', 12), ('john', 'A', 15)]
The `Timsort <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timsort>`_ algorithm used in Python
does multiple sorts efficiently because it can take advantage of any ordering
already present in a dataset.
The Old Way Using Decorate-Sort-Undecorate
==========================================
This idiom is called Decorate-Sort-Undecorate after its three steps:
* First, the initial list is decorated with new values that control the sort order.
* Second, the decorated list is sorted.
* Finally, the decorations are removed, creating a list that contains only the
initial values in the new order.
For example, to sort the student data by *grade* using the DSU approach:
>>> decorated = [(student.grade, i, student) for i, student in enumerate(student_objects)]
>>> decorated.sort()
>>> [student for grade, i, student in decorated] # undecorate
[('john', 'A', 15), ('jane', 'B', 12), ('dave', 'B', 10)]
This idiom works because tuples are compared lexicographically; the first items
are compared; if they are the same then the second items are compared, and so
on.
It is not strictly necessary in all cases to include the index *i* in the
decorated list, but including it gives two benefits:
* The sort is stable -- if two items have the same key, their order will be
preserved in the sorted list.
* The original items do not have to be comparable because the ordering of the
decorated tuples will be determined by at most the first two items. So for
example the original list could contain complex numbers which cannot be sorted
directly.
Another name for this idiom is
`Schwartzian transform <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwartzian_transform>`_\,
after Randal L. Schwartz, who popularized it among Perl programmers.
Now that Python sorting provides key-functions, this technique is not often needed.
The Old Way Using the *cmp* Parameter
=====================================
Many constructs given in this HOWTO assume Python 2.4 or later. Before that,
there was no :func:`sorted` builtin and :meth:`list.sort` took no keyword
arguments. Instead, all of the Py2.x versions supported a *cmp* parameter to
handle user specified comparison functions.
In Py3.0, the *cmp* parameter was removed entirely (as part of a larger effort to
simplify and unify the language, eliminating the conflict between rich
comparisons and the :meth:`__cmp__` magic method).
In Py2.x, sort allowed an optional function which can be called for doing the
comparisons. That function should take two arguments to be compared and then
return a negative value for less-than, return zero if they are equal, or return
a positive value for greater-than. For example, we can do:
>>> def numeric_compare(x, y):
return x - y
>>> sorted([5, 2, 4, 1, 3], cmp=numeric_compare)
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Or you can reverse the order of comparison with:
>>> def reverse_numeric(x, y):
return y - x
>>> sorted([5, 2, 4, 1, 3], cmp=reverse_numeric)
[5, 4, 3, 2, 1]
When porting code from Python 2.x to 3.x, the situation can arise when you have
the user supplying a comparison function and you need to convert that to a key
function. The following wrapper makes that easy to do::
def cmp_to_key(mycmp):
'Convert a cmp= function into a key= function'
class K(object):
def __init__(self, obj, *args):
self.obj = obj
def __lt__(self, other):
return mycmp(self.obj, other.obj) < 0
def __gt__(self, other):
return mycmp(self.obj, other.obj) > 0
def __eq__(self, other):
return mycmp(self.obj, other.obj) == 0
def __le__(self, other):
return mycmp(self.obj, other.obj) <= 0
def __ge__(self, other):
return mycmp(self.obj, other.obj) >= 0
def __ne__(self, other):
return mycmp(self.obj, other.obj) != 0
return K
To convert to a key function, just wrap the old comparison function:
>>> sorted([5, 2, 4, 1, 3], key=cmp_to_key(reverse_numeric))
[5, 4, 3, 2, 1]
Odd and Ends
============
* For locale aware sorting, use :func:`locale.strxfrm` for a key function or
:func:`locale.strcoll` for a comparison function.
* The *reverse* parameter still maintains sort stability (i.e. records with
equal keys retain the original order). Interestingly, that effect can be
simulated without the parameter by using the builtin :func:`reversed` function
twice:
>>> data = [('red', 1), ('blue', 1), ('red', 2), ('blue', 2)]
>>> assert sorted(data, reverse=True) == list(reversed(sorted(reversed(data))))
* The sort routines are guaranteed to use :meth:`__lt__` when making comparisons
between two objects. So, it is easy to add a standard sort order to a class by
defining an :meth:`__lt__` method::
>>> Student.__lt__ = lambda self, other: self.age < other.age
>>> sorted(student_objects)
[('dave', 'B', 10), ('jane', 'B', 12), ('john', 'A', 15)]
* Key functions need not depend directly on the objects being sorted. A key
function can also access external resources. For instance, if the student grades
are stored in a dictionary, they can be used to sort a separate list of student
names:
>>> students = ['dave', 'john', 'jane']
>>> newgrades = {'john': 'F', 'jane':'A', 'dave': 'C'}
>>> sorted(students, key=newgrades.__getitem__)
['jane', 'dave', 'john']
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment