Commit b44acebc authored by Zachary Ware's avatar Zachary Ware

Actually fix suspicious markup, I ignored it too readily

parent dec2df3d
...@@ -297,7 +297,6 @@ whatsnew/3.5,,:warning,'WARNING:root:warning\n' ...@@ -297,7 +297,6 @@ whatsnew/3.5,,:warning,'WARNING:root:warning\n'
whatsnew/3.5,,::,>>> addr6 = ipaddress.IPv6Address('::1') whatsnew/3.5,,::,>>> addr6 = ipaddress.IPv6Address('::1')
whatsnew/3.5,,:root,ERROR:root:exception whatsnew/3.5,,:root,ERROR:root:exception
whatsnew/3.5,,:exception,ERROR:root:exception whatsnew/3.5,,:exception,ERROR:root:exception
whatsnew/3.6,,`,1000000000000000`
whatsnew/changelog,,:version,import sys; I = version[:version.index(' ')] whatsnew/changelog,,:version,import sys; I = version[:version.index(' ')]
whatsnew/changelog,,:gz,": TarFile opened with external fileobj and ""w:gz"" mode didn't" whatsnew/changelog,,:gz,": TarFile opened with external fileobj and ""w:gz"" mode didn't"
whatsnew/changelog,,::,": Use ""127.0.0.1"" or ""::1"" instead of ""localhost"" as much as" whatsnew/changelog,,::,": Use ""127.0.0.1"" or ""::1"" instead of ""localhost"" as much as"
...@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ PEP 515: Underscores in Numeric Literals ...@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ PEP 515: Underscores in Numeric Literals
Prior to PEP 515, there was no support for writing long numeric Prior to PEP 515, there was no support for writing long numeric
literals with some form of separator to improve readability. For literals with some form of separator to improve readability. For
instance, how big is ``1000000000000000```? With :pep:`515`, though, instance, how big is ``1000000000000000``? With :pep:`515`, though,
you can use underscores to separate digits as desired to make numeric you can use underscores to separate digits as desired to make numeric
literals easier to read: ``1_000_000_000_000_000``. Underscores can be literals easier to read: ``1_000_000_000_000_000``. Underscores can be
used with other numeric literals beyond integers, e.g. used with other numeric literals beyond integers, e.g.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment