Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
G
gevent
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
Analytics
Analytics
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Kirill Smelkov
gevent
Commits
d96b2a21
Commit
d96b2a21
authored
Jan 27, 2016
by
Jason Madden
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
Fix #798 by taking module-level locks, just like Python 3 does.
parent
c87bf86e
Changes
2
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
with
40 additions
and
8 deletions
+40
-8
changelog.rst
changelog.rst
+3
-1
gevent/builtins.py
gevent/builtins.py
+37
-7
No files found.
changelog.rst
View file @
d96b2a21
...
...
@@ -7,7 +7,9 @@
1.1rc4 (unreleased)
===================
- TBD
- Python 2: Using the blocking API at import time when multiple
greenlets are also importing should not lead to ``LoopExit``.
Reported in :issue:`798` by Garrett Heel.
1.1rc3 (Jan 04, 2016)
=====================
...
...
gevent/builtins.py
View file @
d96b2a21
...
...
@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ from __future__ import absolute_import
import
imp
# deprecated since 3.4; issues PendingDeprecationWarning in 3.5
import
sys
import
gevent.lock
import
weakref
from
gevent.lock
import
RLock
# Normally we'd have the "expected" case inside the try
# (Python 3, because Python 3 is the way forward). But
...
...
@@ -27,13 +28,43 @@ _import = builtins.__import__
# And the order matters. Note that under 3.4, the global import lock
# and imp module are deprecated. It seems that in all Py3 versions, a
# module lock is used such that this fix is not necessary.
_g_import_lock
=
gevent
.
lock
.
RLock
()
# We emulate the per-module locking system under Python 2 in order to
# avoid issues acquiring locks in multiple-level-deep imports
# that attempt to use the gevent blocking API at runtime; using one lock
# could lead to a LoopExit error as a greenlet attempts to block on it while
# it's already held by the main greenlet (issue #798).
# We base this approach on a simplification of what `importlib._boonstrap`
# does; notably, we don't check for deadlocks
_g_import_locks
=
{}
# name -> wref of RLock
__lock_imports
=
True
def
__module_lock
(
name
):
# Return the lock for the given module, creating it if necessary.
# It will be removed when no longer needed
lock
=
None
try
:
lock
=
_g_import_locks
[
name
]()
except
KeyError
:
pass
if
lock
is
None
:
lock
=
RLock
()
def
cb
(
_
):
del
_g_import_locks
[
name
]
_g_import_locks
[
name
]
=
weakref
.
ref
(
lock
,
cb
)
return
lock
def
__import__
(
*
args
,
**
kwargs
):
"""
__import__(name, globals=None, locals=None, fromlist=(), level=0) -> object
Normally python protects imports against concurrency by doing some locking
at the C level (at least, it does that in CPython). This function just
wraps the normal __import__ functionality in a recursive lock, ensuring that
...
...
@@ -45,19 +76,18 @@ def __import__(*args, **kwargs):
# No such protection exists for monkey-patched builtins,
# however, so this is necessary.
args
=
args
[
1
:]
# TODO: It would be nice not to have to acquire the locks
# if the module is already imported (in sys.modules), but the interpretation
# of the arguments is somewhat complex.
if
not
__lock_imports
:
return
_import
(
*
args
,
**
kwargs
)
module_lock
=
__module_lock
(
args
[
0
])
# Get a lock for the module name
imp
.
acquire_lock
()
try
:
_g_import
_lock
.
acquire
()
module
_lock
.
acquire
()
try
:
result
=
_import
(
*
args
,
**
kwargs
)
finally
:
_g_import
_lock
.
release
()
module
_lock
.
release
()
finally
:
imp
.
release_lock
()
return
result
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment