Commit 06039754 authored by Fernando Luis Vzquez Cao's avatar Fernando Luis Vzquez Cao Committed by Andi Kleen

[PATCH] i386: Disallow kprobes on NMI handlers

A kprobe executes IRET early and that could cause NMI recursion and stack
corruption.

Note: This problem was originally spotted and solved by Andi Kleen in the
x86_64 architecture. This patch is an adaption of his patch for i386.

AK: Merged with current code which was a bit different.
AK: Removed printk in nmi handler that shouldn't be there in the first time
AK: Added missing include.
AK: added KPROBES_END
Signed-off-by: default avatarFernando Vazquez <fernando@intellilink.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
parent 6f6b1e04
......@@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ KPROBE_END(debug)
* check whether we got an NMI on the debug path where the debug
* fault happened on the sysenter path.
*/
ENTRY(nmi)
KPROBE_ENTRY(nmi)
RING0_INT_FRAME
pushl %eax
CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET 4
......@@ -805,6 +805,7 @@ nmi_16bit_stack:
.align 4
.long 1b,iret_exc
.previous
KPROBE_END(nmi)
KPROBE_ENTRY(int3)
RING0_INT_FRAME
......
......@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <linux/sysctl.h>
#include <linux/percpu.h>
#include <linux/dmi.h>
#include <linux/kprobes.h>
#include <asm/smp.h>
#include <asm/nmi.h>
......@@ -882,7 +883,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(touch_nmi_watchdog);
extern void die_nmi(struct pt_regs *, const char *msg);
int nmi_watchdog_tick (struct pt_regs * regs, unsigned reason)
__kprobes int nmi_watchdog_tick(struct pt_regs * regs, unsigned reason)
{
/*
......@@ -962,8 +963,7 @@ int nmi_watchdog_tick (struct pt_regs * regs, unsigned reason)
* This matches the old behaviour.
*/
rc = 1;
} else
printk(KERN_WARNING "Unknown enabled NMI hardware?!\n");
}
}
done:
return rc;
......
......@@ -689,7 +689,8 @@ fastcall void __kprobes do_general_protection(struct pt_regs * regs,
}
}
static void mem_parity_error(unsigned char reason, struct pt_regs * regs)
static __kprobes void
mem_parity_error(unsigned char reason, struct pt_regs * regs)
{
printk(KERN_EMERG "Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason %02x on "
"CPU %d.\n", reason, smp_processor_id());
......@@ -704,7 +705,8 @@ static void mem_parity_error(unsigned char reason, struct pt_regs * regs)
clear_mem_error(reason);
}
static void io_check_error(unsigned char reason, struct pt_regs * regs)
static __kprobes void
io_check_error(unsigned char reason, struct pt_regs * regs)
{
unsigned long i;
......@@ -720,7 +722,8 @@ static void io_check_error(unsigned char reason, struct pt_regs * regs)
outb(reason, 0x61);
}
static void unknown_nmi_error(unsigned char reason, struct pt_regs * regs)
static __kprobes void
unknown_nmi_error(unsigned char reason, struct pt_regs * regs)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_MCA
/* Might actually be able to figure out what the guilty party
......@@ -741,7 +744,7 @@ static void unknown_nmi_error(unsigned char reason, struct pt_regs * regs)
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nmi_print_lock);
void die_nmi (struct pt_regs *regs, const char *msg)
void __kprobes die_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs, const char *msg)
{
if (notify_die(DIE_NMIWATCHDOG, msg, regs, 0, 2, SIGINT) ==
NOTIFY_STOP)
......@@ -773,7 +776,7 @@ void die_nmi (struct pt_regs *regs, const char *msg)
do_exit(SIGSEGV);
}
static void default_do_nmi(struct pt_regs * regs)
static __kprobes void default_do_nmi(struct pt_regs * regs)
{
unsigned char reason = 0;
......@@ -811,7 +814,7 @@ static void default_do_nmi(struct pt_regs * regs)
reassert_nmi();
}
fastcall void do_nmi(struct pt_regs * regs, long error_code)
fastcall __kprobes void do_nmi(struct pt_regs * regs, long error_code)
{
int cpu;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment