Commit 06bcfedd authored by Steve French's avatar Steve French

[CIFS] Fix typo in earlier cifs_unlink change and protect one

extra path.

Since cifs_unlink can also be called from rename path and there
was one report of oops am making the extra check for null inode.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
parent e9917a00
......@@ -565,14 +565,14 @@ int cifs_unlink(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *direntry)
struct cifsInodeInfo *cifsInode;
FILE_BASIC_INFO *pinfo_buf;
cFYI(1, ("cifs_unlink, inode = 0x%p with ", inode));
cFYI(1, ("cifs_unlink, inode = 0x%p", inode));
xid = GetXid();
if(inode)
cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(inode->i_sb);
else
cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(dentry->d_sb);
cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(direntry->d_sb);
pTcon = cifs_sb->tcon;
/* Unlink can be called from rename so we can not grab the sem here
......@@ -695,9 +695,11 @@ int cifs_unlink(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *direntry)
when needed */
direntry->d_inode->i_ctime = current_fs_time(inode->i_sb);
}
if(inode) {
inode->i_ctime = inode->i_mtime = current_fs_time(inode->i_sb);
cifsInode = CIFS_I(inode);
cifsInode->time = 0; /* force revalidate of dir as well */
}
kfree(full_path);
FreeXid(xid);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment